Comments on: Clever /monkey/human/robot/alien

Clever /monkey/human/robot/alien

VikingSword — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:45:04 -0800

'On the Hunt for Universal Intelligence' 'How do you use a scientific method to measure the intelligence of a human being, an animal, a machine or an extra-terrestrial? So far this has not been possible, but a team of Spanish and Australian researchers have taken a first step towards this by presenting the foundations to be used as a basis for this method in the journal Artificial Intelligence, and have also put forward a new intelligence test.'

'The implications of a universal intelligence test also impact on many other disciplines. This could have a significant impact on most cognitive sciences, since any discipline depends largely on the specific techniques and systems used in it and the mathematical basis that underpins it. "The universal and unified evaluation of intelligence, be it human, non-human animal, artificial or extraterrestrial, has not been approached from a scientific viewpoint before, and this is a first step," the researcher concludes.' And what about our wetware? Neuroscientists are on the hunt.

By: infinitewindow

infinitewindow — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:51:56 -0800

Intelligence does not necessarily mean sentience. Obligatory link to Blindsight.

By: Flunkie

Flunkie — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:06:48 -0800

Is there a website or something where I could take this new universal intelligence test? Have I already failed the universal intelligence test by not having noticed a link to it?

By: Flunkie

Flunkie — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:12:02 -0800

Or at least a place where it's described in more detail than merely "uses the so-called 'Kolmogorov complexity"?

By: creasy boy

creasy boy — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:13:28 -0800

I was skeptical that they'd be able to describe a scientific method for determining what the concept of intelligence should consist in. But then I clicked through, and it sounds like they've just assumed some definition of intelligence and what they're looking for is some technical method of testing it in babies, robots, and aliens. Also I simply don't understand this bit: The implications of a universal intelligence test also impact on many other disciplines. This could have a significant impact on most cognitive sciences, since any discipline depends largely on the specific techniques and systems used in it and the mathematical basis that underpins it. Is this a non-sequiter? Or am I missing something? Sure, cognitive science depends largely on the techniques it uses ... but does it really depend on a technique for measuring intelligence in babies, robots and aliens?

By: VikingSword

VikingSword — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:14:39 -0800

Flunkie, you can always contact the researchers. Link to the abstract.

By: nzero

nzero — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:16:22 -0800

Somebody's gonna trot it out, might as well be me: g, a statistical myth.

By: polymodus

polymodus — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:16:58 -0800

Neat... At a high level it seems like their work is about applying some of the fundamental principles from information theory and complexity theory to enable comparison between two computers. My basic/curious questions with this approach would be 1) that intelligence is itself vaguely defined; how would you resolve this in a formal definition? and, 2) K() is uncomputable, so what does it even mean to talk about the Kolmogorov complexity of Michelle Kwan?

By: eye of newt

eye of newt — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:49:03 -0800

They need to test out their intelligence test on cats. Scientists used to think cats were colorblind and a lot less intelligent than they now realize, because cats refused to go along with their standard animal tests. "I don't care if you have put my favorite snack behind the green door. I know I'm being played, and I refuse to be played."

By: aeschenkarnos

aeschenkarnos — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:57:05 -0800

eye of newt "I don't care if you have put my favorite snack behind the green door. I know I'm being played, and I refuse to be played." Equally applicable to humans, dogs, pretty much everyone maybe except AIs. Intelligence testing is wildly skewed by social expectations and context, and social benefits and costs perceived by subject and tester.

By: bleary

bleary — Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:08:20 -0800

Website with preprint http://users.dsic.upv.es/proy/anynt/

By: bleary

bleary — Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:15:29 -0800

The website I posted above links to a page on c-tests with online tests: Computational Measurement of Intelligence