<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Freeserve relaunched today:</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1008/Freeserve-relaunched-today/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Freeserve relaunched today:</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:55:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Freeserve relaunched today:</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1008/Freeserve-relaunched-today</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.freeserve.co.uk"&gt;Freeserve relaunched today:&lt;/a&gt; Considering that the vast majority of UK internet users have this set as their homepage, what&apos;s your opinion on the new-look Freeserve homepage. (it&apos;s like MSN - no?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.1008</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:42:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>williamtry</dc:creator>		<category>UK</category>		<category>internet</category>		<category>Freeserve</category>		<category>relaunch</category>		<category>webdesign</category>		<category>redesign</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Markb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1008/Freeserve-relaunched-today#1863</link>	
		<description>Thankfully I do most of my surfing from a corporate intranet and don&apos;t have to suffer the whims of what an ISP will allow me to find easily, but the initial impression is that there&apos;s nothing new.  
Why does every ISP insist on the &apos;magazine&apos; format for their homepages?  Theres so much more than the &apos;Travel, Shopping, Sports etc...&apos; categories and so many people venture no further than what&apos;s available from their home pages.
Surely a lot of the commercialisation of the net is in some part a result of the large companies manipulating what novice users can easily find through corporate deals and sponsorship.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.1008-1863</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markb</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
