"By 1975, when Milton produced Daylilies, he had begun to draw on transparent Mylar and to etch his copper plates with the aid of photo-resist coating, which hardens when exposed to ultraviolet light but remains soft and permeable wherever covered by a mark. Interposed between the coating and the light, the marks made by a drawing, photograph, or collage leave the coating beneath them penetrable, so that when the coated plate is immersed in acid, the acid will bite in the trail or shadow (so to speak) of the marks.6 This method of etching allows Milton to combine on one plate an indefinite number of drawings and photographs that can be directly transferred."*That article goes on to suggest that he mostly uses photos as guides but the majority of prints I looked at seemed more in the way of photo-mechanical developments than true printmaking in the inked copperplate on paper pressing species. Certainly, a lot of the images look as much like photos as they do etchings. Is it a nitpick? Maybe. I'm not saying that the guy's work isn't worthy or commendable or art, but I don't know that in a strict classification sense whether a lot of his output belongs in the group marked "printmaking".
« Older Facebook's Open Compute Project aims to share with... | For All Mankind "Al Reine... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by device55 at 6:11 PM on April 7, 2011