In a statement Monday, Byrne said he was shocked to discover that the unauthorized use of songs for political ads is "pretty rampant."Okay, the newspaper doesn't print the word "balls," I guess. Fair enough. Oh wait.
"It turns out I am one of the few artists who has the bucks and [guts] to challenge such usage. I'm feeling very manly after my trip to Tampa!" Byrne's statement said.
“I was shocked to discover, while working out our settlement, that the use of songs for political ads is pretty rampant. It turns out I am one of the few artists who has the bucks and cojones to challenge such usage- I'm feeling very manly after my trip to Tampa!"What.
As a Springsteen fan I'm STILL annoyed at the use of Born in the USA by various Republicans. It's an extreme case but it hurts the singer's 'brand' and his image.I, on the other hand, think it's sort of funny, because it's a case of so epically missing the point of the song.
Is there any decent music that Republicans can use in campaigns? Or are they stuck with Toby Keith?They can use Velvet Underground (or at least the drums)
« Older How to Get a Real Education, by Scott Adams... | Why is the Federal Reserve for... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Lukenlogs at 9:22 PM on April 12, 2011