maxwelton: You know, I'd like to think that citizens of all stripes would find this repugnant. However, I'm guessing the republican residents of Michigan will think this is just dandy.Exactly. I have no illusions that Republicans/conservatives will happily applaud this move.
The district is unlikely to eliminate all the teachers. Last year, it sent out 2,000 notices and only a fraction of employees were actually laid off. But the notices are required by the union's current contract with the district. Any layoffs under this latest action won't take effect until late July.It's standard for many states to require lay-off notices well in advance for anyone who they might lay off, or they cannot be let go later. It's a sever message to send everyone layoff notices, but it provides flexibility that they wouldn't have later if the notices weren't sent now.
You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."posted by orthogonality at 7:56 PM on April 16, 2011 [18 favorites]
In the hallowed halls of the Michigan state Capitol this week, one of the biggest debates has been over slashing a program that gives clothes to orphans.Along with cutting the Clothes for Orphans fund, the state is also proposing cutting out burial funds for paupers, breast and cervical cancer screenings for poor women, and benefits for the disabled.
About 160,000 kids wouldn't receive their back-to-school clothing allowance under the Department of Human Services (DHS) budget passed by a House subcommittee. That saves $9.9 million (which will go a long way to pay for the $1.2 billion tax break we're handing businesses).
« Older Ubiquitous yet mysterious, timeless yet tied to a ... | Bad (and some so bad they're g... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Interesting indeed.
posted by rtha at 6:31 PM on April 16, 2011 [1 favorite]