It would have been none the less a choice if, instead of enacting the present statute, the state, by doing nothing, had permitted serious injury to the apple orchards within its borders to go on unchecked. When forced to such a choice the state does not exceed its constitutional powers by deciding upon the destruction of one class of property in order to save another which, in the judgment of the legislature, is of greater value to the public. It will not do to say that the case is merely one of a conflict of two private interests and that the misfortune of apple growers may not be shifted to cedar owners by ordering the destruction of their property; for it is obvious that there may be, and that here there is, a preponderant public concern in the preservation of the one interest over the other.The case is Miller v Schoene, 276 U.S. 272 (1928).
« Older Over the past 50 years, the small coastal plain (c... | Fungus of the month... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by explosion at 10:02 PM on April 29, 2011 [5 favorites]