<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 10382</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 10382</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:11:12 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:11:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 10382</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/15/MN230450.DTL"&gt;I feel represented.&lt;/a&gt; I live in the East Bay, and I cannot believe my feelings towards all this have been represented in congress. Does anyone else feel that petitioning their rep&apos;s may be a good idea? I understand the need for retribution, but, really, is it worth more innocent death? We have carried out search and destroy missions before with zero civilian casualty. I&apos;m sorry to not understand &quot;death to all&quot;, I just think that this is WAY more delicate.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2001 23:48:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tenseone</dc:creator>		<category>sanfrancisco</category>		<category>politics</category>		<category>war</category>		<category>sfgate</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/#134393</link>	
		<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/10339&quot;&gt;We covered this already&lt;/a&gt;. Check the old thread, tons of comments there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382-134393</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:11:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tenseone</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/#134417</link>	
		<description>sorry. emotion overcomes correct steps. i mean it. my first link to mefi gets shitted on. i am not happy with myself.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382-134417</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 01:13:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tenseone</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/#134458</link>	
		<description>Actually, that&apos;s standard operating procedure.  That way the only way to go from here is up, baby!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382-134458</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:37:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rushmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/#134533</link>	
		<description>Personally, I don&apos;t have a problem with your extending the discussion, tenseone.  I think it&apos;s important that everyone have a chance to comment, and no one thread can accommodate all that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382-134533</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fishfucker</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10382/#135339</link>	
		<description>booya for oakland.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10382-135339</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fishfucker</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
