<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 10388</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 10388</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:07:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 10388</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boycottxp.com/story/2001/9/13/91221/1742"&gt;Opportunism in FUD?&lt;/a&gt; Once a term used only for Microsoft, it seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=20165&quot;&gt;FUD&lt;/a&gt; is a common problem these days. The linked site is decidedly anti-MS and seems to be appropriating FUD for their own ends. 

When someone uses the WTC tragedy to try and discredit their opponent in a technical debate have they gone too far?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 02:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soulhuntre</dc:creator>		<category>microsoft</category>		<category>fud</category>		<category>worldtradecenter</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pracowity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/#134452</link>	
		<description>According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=fud&quot;&gt;this dictionary&lt;/a&gt;, FUD is a coinage of Gene Amdahl &quot;after he left IBM to found his own company.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388-134452</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pracowity</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/#134455</link>	
		<description>Besides, just a nit, this doesn&apos;t seem like FUD.  Just a bad argument.

Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt is intended to make someone stop in their tracks long enough for you to move.  I doubt that Microsoft will stand in it&apos;s tracks because of this webpage, y&apos;know?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388-134455</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jragon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/#134586</link>	
		<description>In America, all non-governmental activity stopped in its tracks on the 11th and 12th ... except Microsoft&apos;s lawyers.  It was inappropriate and rude, and this site is simply pointing it out.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388-134586</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:10:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jragon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: davidmsc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/#134592</link>	
		<description>Life goes on.  One of the most important things that Americans can do right now is to GET ON WITH LIVING.  Mourn, reflect, yes...but *life* does not stop.  There&apos;s a world out there -- and we must engage.  

Some could argue that posting trivial comments to MetaFilter is &quot;trivial&quot; or &quot;inappropriate and rude.&quot;  After all, isn&apos;t there SOMETHING more constructive that we could &lt;b&gt;all &lt;/b&gt;be doing in regards to Tuesday&apos;s events?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388-134592</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:21:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidmsc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jairus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10388/#134723</link>	
		<description>BoycottXP.com is perhaps the worst discussion site I&apos;ve ever taken part in. The people are (in general) Linux-nazis who say that &quot;microsoft must fall for the good of humanity&quot;, and people use MS software because of their &quot;ingorance and beloved capitalism (television)&quot; when prompted for discussion. I am not making this up.

I think I have yet to see one news story posted that actually explains -why- we should be boycotting XP. It all seems to be random pro-linux anti-MS babble. It&apos;s like a slashdot where the users have no social skills. 

I&apos;m actually surprised they didn&apos;t blame Bill Gates outright for using windows to remotely fly the planes into the WTC.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10388-134723</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:17:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
