<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 10515</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 10515</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:59:19 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:59:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 10515</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2001/september/09_17_4.html"&gt;Iran launches missile attack on Iraq&lt;/a&gt; Anyone seen this reported by other sources?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:47:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dagny</dc:creator>		<category>middleeast</category>		<category>meast</category>		<category>iraq</category>		<category>iran</category>		<category>missile</category>		<category>falsealarm</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jasonshellen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136549</link>	
		<description>Damn your quick on the draw dagny, gotta quit trying to write eloquent, curly commentary with my front page posts.

No, this is the only place I have seen this. Can we assume from this that Iran is backing a US led war in the Middle East? Sides are being drawn very quickly in the region. I heard on the radio this morning that China has backed Afghanistan. Things are shaping up to be more than we initially bargained for with all the fist shaking going on in Washington. I wonder if the pollsters have been asking people... &apos;Would you support a war against China?&apos; Might get a few different answers than in some of these 89% pro war polls I have seen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136549</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:59:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jasonshellen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kliuless</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136567</link>	
		<description>war against china? they just got clearance to join the WTO.

oh and there&apos;s the olympics...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136567</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:13:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jeffvc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136573</link>	
		<description>&lt;p&gt;jasonshellen: you don&apos;t have another link, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136573</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:19:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffvc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jasonshellen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136582</link>	
		<description>Still searching for a better link than this one: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bday.co.za/bday/content/direct/1,3523,930274-6098-0,00.html&quot;&gt;&apos;China says US military retaliation is not wise&apos;&lt;/a&gt;. I heard the original &apos;China backs Afghanistan&apos; report on the radio so I am trying to verify it&apos;s authenticity. Gimme a few minutes...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136582</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jasonshellen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eric anders</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136587</link>	
		<description>Can&apos;t find the link, but Jason maybe you&apos;re talking about the fact that China signed some sort of accord with Afghanistan on something. I believe the date of that story was 9.12.01</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136587</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:35:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eric anders</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jasonshellen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136590</link>	
		<description>Ok, just heard on the radio that this was &apos;speculation from yesterday&apos;. I am getting a little sick of the amount of speculation going on with the media and I am sorry to have perpetuated it. Although I guess it could be argued that anything is possible. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/091801/opi_7307003.html&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; seems to make a little more sense given China&apos;s interests.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136590</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:37:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jasonshellen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: moz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136621</link>	
		<description>hey, so i guess it is world war 3 then.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136621</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:05:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jbelshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136647</link>	
		<description>The news networks reported yesterday that China was sealing off its border with Afghanistan, because of fears of terrorists fleeing to China.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136647</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbelshaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mossy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136688</link>	
		<description>China signed an economic agreement with Afghanistan the day before the attack I believe, or was it on the day of the attack? China won&apos;t get into a war now - they&apos;ll want to get into a position of near economic equality with the US before trying that... Hey, they have the resources, they&apos;ve introduced those capitalist areas (I went to Shenzen a little while back, looks very properous indeed, and these areas are growing ridiculously fast - cheap labour, resources etc). Ah, worrying gets you nowhere.. China won&apos;t support the Afghans come war - the Pakistanis might, but only after the army revolts..</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136688</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mossy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: vbfg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10515/#136735</link>	
		<description>When China reaches parity with the US they&apos;ll be as plugged in to the global economy as any other trading nation. War is bad for business, though they do have &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_829000/829986.stm&quot;&gt;Muslim seperatists&lt;/a&gt; of their own.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.10515-136735</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vbfg</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
