Other female characters were introduced, and developed beyond stereotype; we learned to value McGonagall as much as Dumbledore, to stop slagging Lavender Brown off as clingy and gross because she actually wanted her boyfriend to like her, to see the Patil sisters and Luna as something other than flaky, intuitive, girly idiots. Unbelievably, even Ginny Weasley got an actual personality. Hermione was not an exceptionalist, the one girl in the world worth liking; she didn’t need to be surrounded by female stereotypes in order to stand out as a compelling female character.
For starters, she gave us a female lead. As difficult as it is to imagine, Rowling was pressured to revise her initial drafts to make the lead wizard male. “More universal,” they said. “Nobody’s going to follow a female character for 4,000 pages,” they said. “Girls don’t buy books,” they said, “and boys won’t buy books about them.” But Rowling proved them wrong.
Honestly, I suspect if an author did that but swapped Harry and Hermione's positions, they'd get slagged for saying "girls need help."
I don't care how studious they are, anyone under $LOCAL_DRINKING_AGE$ shouldn't be trusted with the ability to fuck around with causality.
« Older The chief of the world's leading physics lab at CE... | Pluto may have been downsized ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt