She also led attacks on German installations and the local Gestapo HQ in Montluçon.[4] From April 1944 to the complete liberation of France, her 7,000 maquisards fought 22,000 SS soldiers, causing 1,400 casualties, while taking only 100 themselves. Her French companions, especially Henri Tardivat, praised her fighting spirit, amply demonstrated when she killed an SS sentry with her bare hands to prevent him raising the alarm during a raid. During a 1990s television interview, when asked what had happened to the sentry who spotted her, Wake simply drew her finger across her throat.
Why waste time making up shit like Inglorious Basterds when there's no movie about Ms Wake?
She also learned that the Gestapo had tortured her husband to death in 1943 for refusing to disclose her whereabouts.
He would have been one of a handful to die without revealing his secrets to the Gestapo. posted by rodgerd at 1:26 AM on August 8, 2011 [6 favorites]
I dunno, why don't you make your own movie? You don't even need to read the links to see there are already 2, with a third on the way. posted by Wolof at 1:46 AM on August 8, 2011 [1 favorite]
A young feminists' group is determined to establish a memorial in memory of World War II heroine Nancy Wake.
Wake was the Allies' most decorated servicewoman, collecting bravery awards from France, England, Australia and the United States - but she had never been formally recognised by the country where she was born.
"Whenever somebody dobbed her in, they would go there and she would be gone. Nancy would get away from them.
"The world offered a reward for anyone who could catch The White Mouse. They grabbed her husband, Henri, and the Gestapo tortured him to death."
Today they would call her a terrorist, but everything else about the story seems entirely modern right down to the torturing to death. posted by three blind mice at 2:22 AM on August 8, 2011
.
The more I learn about Nancy the more impressed I am. posted by dangerousdan at 3:01 AM on August 8, 2011
It's worth pointing out that after the War she came back to Australia and was very politically active in the post-war, running as a candidate for the Liberal (ie. conservative) Party in several elections. Peace and war, an intercontinental bad-arse. posted by Fiasco da Gama at 5:43 AM on August 8, 2011
I was reading about Nancy Wake in the paper this morning, and staggered that we never learnt about her at school. Get on that, Australian education system.
That's because she was a terrorist, and an effective one. Terrorism is a tactic and was widely used against the Nazis in all the occupied countries. The U.S. has used terrorism around the world as have other regimes throughout history. posted by charlesminus at 12:12 PM on August 8, 2011
Today they would call her a terrorist
& That's because she was a terrorist, and an effective one
If by terrorism you mean intelligence operation, smuggling food, providing repatriation for escaped POWs and refugees, clandestine news reporting for a legitimate government in exile, destroying military targets like gun factories and engaging uniform troops in guerrilla warfare in order to stop a genocide - as opposed to directly targeting civilians to advance an agenda, then yeah.
Otherwise, no.
Terrorism is a tactic. That doesn't mean it's interconvertible with other tactics simply because they're related by violence.
Her history is almost textbook guerrilla/resistance warfare. She was a commando and a spy, not a terrorist. Demonstrably.
Terrorists destroy rail stations, not rail bridges. Entirely different methodologies at work there.
This is not to contradict the point that countries use terrorism or that it has to take a particular form. I'd argue the bombing of Dresden was terrorism although it was done with all the regular formality of a military operation.
But terrorism against the Nazi regime was nearly worthless. Most particularly given the command of propaganda, control of information and ideological unity the Nazis had.
Most clandestine efforts were like Wake's. Aimed to support the Allies' resilience and destroy Germany's ability to make war, not at the support of the civilian population. No point in terrorizing people if there's no way to control or spread the message. Under those conditions blowing up a bunch of noncombatants is a waste of ordinance, no matter how scary it is.
So you target supply lines, divert front line troops to hunt you, hit and run, all that. No ideology to the comparison at all, it's a simple, practical difference.
From the page linked by Smedleyman right up there ^, emphasis mine:
"2001 - On 6 December Wake leaves Australia for good to spend the remainder of her life in Europe. She lives in the Stafford Hotel in London hotel on the proceeds from the sale of her medals. When these funds run out she receives financial assistance from her many admirers.
"There was no point in keeping them," she says of selling her medals. "When I die, I'll probably go to hell and they'd melt anyway. My only condition is when I die, I want my ashes scattered over the hills where I fought alongside all those men."
Terrorist? Hardly. She attacked military targets, not civilian ones. Guerrilla warrior, but not a terrorist.
Also today in Metafilter - how the Allies destroyed entire cities full of civilians, with the stated intent of making their enemies capitulate. You want to talk about terrorism? posted by His thoughts were red thoughts at 4:37 PM on August 8, 2011
posted by notionoriety at 12:24 AM on August 8, 2011