One of the reasons that English is hard for non-natives to learn is because it has a gargantuan working vocabulary. A typical English speaker uses five times as many words in everyday speech as a speaker in another language such as German or Japanese.Let's have some evidence of that. Russian has a similarly vast technical vocabulary and is arguably more complex due to gender and inflection.
Another problem is... there are well-defined rules for taking a noun and producing an adjective out of it or vice versa which all of us understand, but which make the language virtually incomprehensible to someone not familiar with it.If there are well-defined rules, they are easy to learn. Incomprehensible to someone not familiar with it? There's a shock. I'm unfamiliar with Urdu. Surprisingly enough, Urdu is incomprehensible to me.
Native English speakers seem to have a real hard time learning any new grammar. I suspect it's because English morphological syntax is relatively simple, and if we try and learn languages with more complex syntaxes our language organ (as old Chomsky called it) has forgotten that languages could be structured that wayActually, pretty much anyone older than the age of puberty finds it impossible to achieve near-native competency in any other language. Just listen to the other Joe Clark or John Turner speaking French, or Jean Chrétien speaking English. The exceptions are just that: Exceptions.
« Older Massoud's Last Words... | So where does the US stand wit... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
(at least, that's the consensus of those Google search results I found, 2 of which said Japanese was 2nd-hardest, and a bunch of which all mysteriously agreed that something called the Déné (Chipewyan) language was 3rd-hardest. But I couldn't find a definitive source; and here's one authority saying I'm raising a dumb question and should just let everyone talk about Skallas's link....)
posted by mattpfeff at 10:02 PM on September 20, 2001