Well, that was the one bright side of 9-11; using the planes says that, for now, they don't have nuclear materials. posted by hincandenza at 12:06 AM on September 21, 2001
But it is possible, since Pakistan is so unstable, that the pro-Taliban resistance could destabilize the Musharif government, take it over, and *presto* nuclear weapons....Hmmmm
Here's an article analyzing that very scenario.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2001320010-2001324777,00.html posted by readymade at 12:27 AM on September 21, 2001
Oops, that wasn't the article, although it is informative, and about the subject matter. But there's another one that's better.
Keep looking, readymade.... posted by readymade at 12:39 AM on September 21, 2001
I'm much more worried about how events are going to play out in Pakistan than in Afghanistan. The Taliban are Pakistani, and they seem to have a LOT of supporters there for their particular little bastardization of Islam. Half the country is on a general strike today because the president didn't completely repudiate the US and side with Bin Laden. posted by aaron at 1:25 AM on September 21, 2001
Agreed, aaron. That would make the Indian-Pakistani (read: two nuclear states) clash much more dangerous... And you know that countries would be aligning themselves on both sides, as opposed to this fairly unilateral queueing. posted by fooljay at 10:36 AM on September 21, 2001
« Older
The Dead Zone all over again?...
| Homeland defense...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by hincandenza at 12:06 AM on September 21, 2001