<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: society&apos;s fabric</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post society&apos;s fabric</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:37:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:37:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>society&apos;s fabric</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/tag/park-seung-hoon&quot;&gt;The&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juxtapoz.com/Current/woven-photography-by-seung-hoon-park&quot;&gt;woven&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thisiscolossal.com/2011/08/seung-hoon-park/&quot;&gt;photographs&lt;/a&gt; of&lt;a href=&quot;http://thephotoexchange.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/seung-hoon-park-show-at-sarah-lee-artworks/&quot;&gt; Seung Hoon Park&lt;/a&gt;

New works from South Korean photographer Seung Hoon Park. Park uses a process to overlay or weave together film strips, however this appears to be a single print.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the noob</dc:creator>		<category>SeungHoonPark</category>		<category>Photography</category>		<category>woven</category>		<category>weave</category>		<category>photograph</category>		<category>urban</category>		<category>industrial</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3891844</link>	
		<description>It appears that the photographer is laying 35mm film on the back of a large-format camera, perhaps in alternating rows, like a picket fence. Then the photographer develops the film, and weaves it together. 

An alternate approach would be to take several photographs of a scene with a normal camera and use the enlarger to image the scene onto strips of film. These strips would later be woven together. 

All in all, a nice technique and some very neat images.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3891844</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:37:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fake</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Threeway Handshake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3891859</link>	
		<description>Got to be many 35mm (or smaller) rolls on a large format. Looks like two separatr exposures: one for vertical and one for horizontal strips. Neat.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3891859</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:01:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Threeway Handshake</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3891886</link>	
		<description>What they said.

HOWEVER!  It doesn&apos;t makes sense like that.  The film should be transparent, right?  So printing, the two images would overlap, but they don&apos;t.  Hm.  

I suspect there may be shenanigans afoot.  Are they perhaps woven digitally?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3891886</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:17:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3891890</link>	
		<description>Oh!  Unless the thing that holds the film in the camera is also a sort of weavy dealy that blocks out alternating bits of film.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3891890</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:18:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3891899</link>	
		<description>...or it&apos;s woven after it&apos;s printed, in which case, every sprocket hole was cut out by hand.  &lt;em&gt;Gah!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3891899</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:24:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: smirkette</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3892088</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m voting two exposures (you can see this in the consistency of tone all vertical and all horizontal strips). Re: transparency issue, perhaps lines the back of the film with something opaque before weaving them?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3892088</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:03:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smirkette</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: seanmpuckett</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/106891/societys-fabric#3892094</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m going to say two exposures with a large format camera using strips of 35mm film on a custom film holder, printed just like that onto colour print paper, then the two final prints cut into strips and woven. 

FWIW I did some repro work for a woman who did something like this (two interwoven images) with magazine illustrations and it was tedious for her but not much more tedious than cross-stitch.  It&apos;s a nice effect.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2011:site.106891-3892094</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:25:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanmpuckett</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
