My feeling is this: he could have just as easily had her as a love slave or whatever else he actually wanted without marrying her for fuck's sake. But no, he married her, with no pre-nuptial. He knew what he was doing- and if he didn't, then his later wills would be just as suspect- you can't have it both ways, eh? If ANS could manipulate him because he was senile or addled, then why couldn't his own son do the same? Like has been said, he chose to marry her for better or worse; I 'spect if he'd simply said "I'll give you $25M cash on my death, plus support you lavishly as a live-in girlfriend while I live, but I won't marry you" ANS would have jumped at that offer as quickly. Hell, I would occasionally choke down some liver-spotted cock over a 14 month period for $464M...
posted by hincandenza at 3:26 PM on September 27, 2001
All that said, I'm now gonna have to slowly back away from this thread while nervously laughing, because of that jcterminal comment. Jeez, JCT, didn't you read MeFi's sexual harassment policy?!?
posted by hincandenza at 7:25 PM on September 27, 2001
« Older comment of "the superiority of Western civilisatio... | I'll show you mine...... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
But my question is, how can a California court rule in favor of her despite all these facts, and the fact that a Texas marriage does not automatically give the wife half of the estate?
btw i'm happy that she gets the cash - theres nothing more amusing than watching utter white trash blow such an ungodly sum.
posted by tsarfan at 11:32 AM on September 27, 2001