<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: &apos;Electric Phrenology&apos; as a security device.</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post &apos;Electric Phrenology&apos; as a security device.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:13:54 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:13:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>&apos;Electric Phrenology&apos; as a security device.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/22020.html"&gt;&apos;Electric Phrenology&apos; as a security device.&lt;/a&gt; One of Infoseek&apos;s founders wants to sell the world&apos;s airports on a mind-reading scheme.  Worse, a Pentagon think-tank is taking advice from Jeff &quot;Skunk&quot; Baxter, ex-lead guitarist from the Doobie brothers.  His advice: psychological warfare with drugs, music, and  nanomachines that make you love America. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11601&quot;&gt;[towards bottom]&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:03:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>		<category>infoseek</category>		<category>phrenology</category>		<category>security</category>		<category>mindreading</category>		<category>doobiebrothers</category>		<category>psychologicalwarfare</category>		<category>psychology</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: skallas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device#148517</link>	
		<description>If irony is dead, then common sense died long ago.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131-148517</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:13:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyMeat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device#148525</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;drugs, music, and nanomachines &lt;/i&gt;

I think I saw that written on a crumpled-up piece of paper left over after the meeting where they came up with &quot;sex, drugs, and rock &apos;n&apos; roll.&quot; Good work, guys.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131-148525</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:42:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyMeat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: NortonDC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device#148547</link>	
		<description>Even if it wasn&apos;t bogus, and it had a 100% success rate, employing it would be a blatant violation of the fifth amendment protection against self incrimination.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131-148547</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 21:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NortonDC</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: newnameintown</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device#148868</link>	
		<description>caffeine, The Monkys(sic-spellthankgod), and holding hands. This will defeat any foe. (you think im kiddin)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131-148868</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 11:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>newnameintown</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blissbat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11131/Electric-Phrenology-as-a-security-device#148981</link>	
		<description>Actually, the &quot;brain fingerprinting&quot; bit sounds really similar to the recent brain wave and and reaction time based &quot;lie detectors&quot; discussed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globaltechnoscan.com/13June-19June01/lie_detector.htm&quot;&gt; this article&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/&quot;&gt;New Scientist&lt;/a&gt; (technically a reprint, since you can&apos;t gt to NS archives without being a subscriber).

It might be a mistake to dismiss it out of hand instead of thoroughly considering the potential for serious abuse.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.11131-148981</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blissbat</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
