in the US you do not have the option of having a religious court
 Any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this State and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code or system ... (emphasis added)
the express or implied agreement of the parties [...] could not exclude the overriding requirement that the fundamental principles of natural justice must be observed [...] each party must be given a fair hearing and a fair opportunity to present its case."
The Dangers of Anti-Sharia Laws
Though popular with secularists and religious conservatives, anti-Sharia legislation does not defend against theocracy but calls into question our society’s fundamental commitments to meaningful religious liberty and meaningful access to the courts. These commitments have been relied on by generations of Protestants, Catholics, Mormons, and Jews, and to try to remove them for Muslims both is unjust to Muslims and sets a dangerous precedent for other religious groups.
Yet some religious Americans have come to fear that “creeping Sharia” threatens our legal system and our freedoms. Proposals to legislate against Sharia’s use in the courts have been offered in dozens of states. This attack on the ancient system of Islamic law, a broad and diverse legal code that, like Halakhic law, governs everything from how to contract a marriage to how to prepare a meal, imperils the religious liberty of all Americans.
« Older Tom Murphy is an Anchor/Reporter/Producer and Weat... | "The idea that a species domes... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt