However, after having watched Ryan make his case in the linked interview about his budget plan, the thing that popped out to me the most was how casually he said "Globalization is here," almost in passing. THAT, in my opinion, is the end game because it makes his and any other budget plan obsolete. If there is a significant Dollar event, be prepared to ACTUALLY scrap the tax code, and every other financial code for that matter, because the monetary authority will likely have shifted to the IMF, or a global financial assembly like it.
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road. the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.
What is this paranoid nonsense? In the context of ryan's quote 'globalization' simply meant international trade, outsourcing, etc. Not some kind of global government. The IFM isn't like the Fed or ECB, they can only lend money people give them. How would they 'take over'.
(Also "Dollar Event"? What is a "Dollar Event"?)
« Older The Red Hook Criterium is "an unsanctioned race he... | The (Totally) Phantom Menace .... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt