<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Let&apos;s just lose him at sea</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Let&apos;s just lose him at sea</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:05:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:05:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Let&apos;s just lose him at sea</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea</link>	
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304750404577319952818130854.html&quot;&gt;harrowing tale&lt;/a&gt; of Ensign Chuck Hord, lost at sea in 1908.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>griphus</dc:creator>		<category>navalhistory</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: R. Schlock</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300179</link>	
		<description>.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300179</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:05:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>R. Schlock</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jabberjaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300181</link>	
		<description>Well, to quote Marge Simpson: &quot;I guess it was a pretty funny prank! I like the ones where nothing catches on fire.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300181</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:08:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jabberjaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pupdog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300184</link>	
		<description>And they would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn&apos;t for &lt;strike&gt;those meddling kids&lt;/strike&gt; The Wall Street Journal!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300184</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pupdog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: smitt</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300186</link>	
		<description>Or: How the Wall Street Journal ruined a great prank.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300186</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:12:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smitt</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ardgedee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300189</link>	
		<description>Pentagon officials use smilies in official media correspondance?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300189</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:14:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ardgedee</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ardgedee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300194</link>	
		<description>But yeah, this article was about 20 years too early. The portrait had to hang their long enough for a full generation of staff to have come in and out and grown accustomed to the thing, before inertia would be sufficient to keep the portrait up when publicized.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300194</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:16:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ardgedee</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: zarq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300200</link>	
		<description>Leave it to the Wall Street Journal to fuck up a perfectly good prank.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300200</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:18:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zarq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: griphus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300207</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://oi43.tinypic.com/2e6927l.jpg&quot;&gt;They had their reasons&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300207</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>griphus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Redhush</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300210</link>	
		<description>The portrait, .......  now sits on the floor of the office where Capt. Hord once worked, leaning against a cubicle wall.


Almost makes being lost at sea sound like a much better way to end up</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300210</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:23:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Redhush</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mchelly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300228</link>	
		<description>Thanks a lot, WSJ. This is why we can&apos;t have nice things.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300228</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mchelly</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300249</link>	
		<description>So I take it no one there had a passing background in oil paintings cause uh, a textured photograph does look like an oil painting. At all. I&apos;d be wondering why a masterful photorealist who could blend skin tones better than Ingre was doing officer portraits.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300249</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:50:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cjorgensen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300250</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/04/17/150818573/pranksters-put-fake-ensigns-portrait-on-pentagon-wall-it-stayed-for-months&quot;&gt;All Things Considered&lt;/a&gt; on the story.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300250</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:50:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cjorgensen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300253</link>	
		<description>Also in no way could that be mistaken for a painting from the early 20th century - the colors alone all are wrong for the very conservative and formalized portrait genre and you&apos;d be brush strokes under the lacquer and Edwardians did not have hair like that I just-just having an Art History Geek fit over here</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300253</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:53:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: griphus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300263</link>	
		<description>A group of Pentagon officials march briskly through a series of basement corridors in the Pentagon. They stop at an door marked &quot;BUREAU OF AESTHETICS,&quot; knock, and it opens. The room behind the door is an artists&apos; studio, with a number of men wearing paint-flecked smocks over crisp suits. They are working on numerous easels, painting Expressionist recreations of satellite imagery, Cubist portraits of spy photos of foreign officials, and so on. There is a brief silence.

&quot;Gentlemen,&quot; states the head official, &quot;please follow me. We need you to take a look at something.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300263</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>griphus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Renault</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300265</link>	
		<description>Now I&apos;ve hord it all.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300265</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:59:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Renault</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: vidur</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300310</link>	
		<description>The best of investigative journalism!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300310</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:11:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vidur</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ThisIsNotMe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300356</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A group of Pentagon officials march briskly through a series of basement corridors in the Pentagon. They stop at an door marked &quot;BUREAU OF AESTHETICS,&quot;...&lt;/i&gt;

That&apos;s ridiculous.  Everyone knows that the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/TIOH/contact.aspx&apos;&gt;Institute of Heraldry is at Fr. Belvoir&lt;/a&gt;! (despite the huge picture of the Pentagon on that page.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300356</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:21:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ThisIsNotMe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JoanArkham</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300376</link>	
		<description>We have a &quot;Hall of Former Officials&quot; here, and one of them looks exactly like the 1970s version of Betty Crocker. I&apos;ve long wanted to swap out that portrait...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300376</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:27:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JoanArkham</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fearfulsymmetry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300377</link>	
		<description>He was well hung</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300377</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fearfulsymmetry</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bicyclefish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300403</link>	
		<description>Well, that was worthwhile.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300403</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:38:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bicyclefish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Meanie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300477</link>	
		<description>&quot;Look Like You Belong There&quot; is the prime directive for anyone sneaking into something, past something, and apparently also mounted onto something.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300477</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:00:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blue Meanie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Petrot</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300698</link>	
		<description>At the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, UK, in an old corridor, there is a black and white photo of a WWI general. But it&apos;s actually General Melchett, from the TV series Blackadder, played by Stephen Fry.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300698</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Petrot</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Scram</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4300854</link>	
		<description>The Whelk, I&apos;m seconding your Art History Geek fit over here. It is so unnerving to get evidence that &quot;normal&quot; people cannot see how wrong something fake-old looks. (Remember &lt;em&gt;Titanic&lt;/em&gt;, with the Nagel-style &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kate-winslet_titanic_movie_pencil-drawing.jpg&quot;&gt;nude&lt;/a&gt; of Kate Winslet? A James Cameron original, even.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4300854</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:53:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scram</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: IndigoJones</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4302714</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It is so unnerving to get evidence that &quot;normal&quot; people cannot see how wrong something fake-old looks.&lt;/em&gt;

This assumes anyone actually bothered to look at it.  Unlike, say, the experts failed to see how wrong &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.essentialvermeer.com/misc/van_meegeren.html&quot;&gt;Van Meegeren&lt;/a&gt; was.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4302714</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:31:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndigoJones</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115004/Lets-just-lose-him-at-sea#4302721</link>	
		<description>Van Meegeren painted like Vermeer so well it fooled everyone. That&apos;s hardly the same thing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115004-4302721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:34:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
