<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:08:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams</link>	
		<description>&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://prl.aps.org/accepted/L/3507dYd1A8b1ed34d3e32f058eb40a716e9a836ae?ajax=1&amp;height=500&amp;width=500&quot;&gt;We measure, in a single experiment, both the radiation pressure and the torque due to a wide variety of propagating acoustic vortex beams.&lt;/a&gt; The results validate, for the first time directly, the theoretically predicted ratio of the orbital angular momentum to linear momentum in a propagating beam. We experimentally determine this ratio using simultaneous measurements of both the levitation force and the torque on an acoustic absorber exerted by a broad range of helical ultrasonic beams produced by a 1000-element matrix transducer array.&quot; In other words, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-17760077&quot;&gt;science has created the sonic screwdriver&lt;/a&gt;, and it could mean new advances in non-invasive surgery. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dundee.ac.uk/pressreleases/2012/april12/sonicscrewdriver.htm&quot;&gt;official release from the University of Dundee&lt;/a&gt;, plus a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeB69CcLEI8&quot;&gt;couple&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLN3AIgfV20&quot;&gt;videos&lt;/a&gt;. Still doesn&apos;t work on wood.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:00:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jbickers</dc:creator>		<category>technology</category>		<category>medicine</category>		<category>doctorwho</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tivalasvegas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310496</link>	
		<description>I must confess that I do not understand about 90 percent of the nouns in this post, but &apos;sonic screwdriver&apos; sounds to me like magic and I heartily approve.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310496</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tivalasvegas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eugenen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310529</link>	
		<description>Why does the BBC put &quot;invented&quot; in scare quotes?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310529</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:22:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eugenen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: koeselitz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310549</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;eugenen: &lt;/small&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Why does the BBC put &amp;lsquo;invented&amp;rsquo; in scare quotes?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;

Because it&apos;s weird to say that someone invented something that was created by a popular television show?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310549</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:29:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>koeselitz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: koeselitz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310552</link>	
		<description>Also, they went an interesting route with this in making it bigger on the outside than it is on the inside.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310552</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>koeselitz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pre-Taped Call In Show</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310564</link>	
		<description>Wow, cool. Vortex beams have been a big subject in optics for a while now but I&apos;ve never heard of acoustic ones. I wish they had a preprint - would be interesting to know things like the beam divergence. Also, the disc they levitate is 90 g but I wonder how much heavier that is than the displaced water (ie what is the actual lifting force generated).

The BBC uses inverted commas like crazy in their headlines. They reached peak inverted commas about 6 months ago and have actually backed off a lot since - reading the headlines display on their mobile site used to drive me nuts. In this case, it&apos;s because they haven&apos;t &lt;em&gt;literally&lt;/em&gt; invented a sonic screwdriver. For example, I think this one actually would work on wood if you drove it hard enough.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310564</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:34:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pre-Taped Call In Show</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Chekhovian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310567</link>	
		<description>I love sci-fi, and I love science, but when the too meet in a press release, it fills me with blinding rage.  At least its been a while since we got one of those &quot;one step closer to Harry Potter&apos;s invisibility cloak&quot; headlines</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310567</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:35:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chekhovian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tivalasvegas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310624</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;peak inverted commas&lt;/i&gt;

And with this comment, we have reached peak &apos;peak-labeling&apos;. Well played, &lt;b&gt;Pre-Taped Call In Show&lt;/b&gt;.

Questions for people who Know About Science: what are the practical implications of this? Is being able to turn things with sound a transformative ability or does it just make it easier to do things that could be done with previous techniques (granted I didn&apos;t really know that we were moving things in straight lines with sound, so I may be not-even-wrong here)? Is this scalable to larger efforts or would that be theoretically or practically impossible?

&lt;small&gt;Honestly, I just want to know if this will lead to man-made tornadoes so that I can prepare accordingly.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310624</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:56:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tivalasvegas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Moofoo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310764</link>	
		<description>Can it reverse the polarity of a neutron flow?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310764</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mister Moofoo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmyk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310772</link>	
		<description>What, you&apos;ve never had a long night? Never had a lot of cabinets to put up?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310772</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:45:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmyk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mwhybark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310862</link>	
		<description>what&apos;s the progress report on the quantum spanner?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310862</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:19:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mwhybark</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gimonca</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4310972</link>	
		<description>Can someone read this post to me in Leonard Nimoy&apos;s voice? Thanks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4310972</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:16:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gimonca</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: -harlequin-</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115243/Mechanical-evidence-of-the-orbital-angular-momentum-to-energy-ratio-of-vortex-beams#4317883</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Honestly, I just want to know if this will lead to man-made tornadoes so that I can prepare accordingly.&lt;/i&gt;

More specifically, you fear a future of man-&lt;i&gt;controlled&lt;/i&gt; tornadoes. Man-&lt;i&gt;made&lt;/i&gt; tornadoes... it&apos;s starting to look like we accidentally did that already, while we weren&apos;t paying attention. (Oops. Sorry.)

But it raises the question: What does a sonic tornado &lt;i&gt;sound like&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.115243-4317883</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>-harlequin-</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
