I enjoyed that a lot. posted by bleep at 6:30 PM on July 2, 2012
Danny Pudi, isn't it? (Sorry.) Funny! posted by Occula at 6:30 PM on July 2, 2012 [1 favorite]
How is the Danny Pudi involvement not your lead, here? posted by redsparkler at 6:31 PM on July 2, 2012
I kinda just want to watch this guy recite Shakespeare. posted by PhoBWanKenobi at 6:34 PM on July 2, 2012
I think I need to see this at least five more times to catch everything. That's some pretty tight scenework, right there.
Although truth be told, I would've liked the Danny Pudi appearance to be more of a surprise, myself. posted by Strange Interlude at 6:39 PM on July 2, 2012
Danny Pudi, isn't it? (Sorry.) Funny!
Yep, apparently I was convinced that you spelled his name otherwise. At least the tags reflect the correct spelling. posted by codacorolla at 6:50 PM on July 2, 2012
Danny Pudi! Hooray! posted by epj at 7:00 PM on July 2, 2012
So who was in the hand? posted by maryr at 7:09 PM on July 2, 2012
I almost passed over this. I'm glad I didn't. That was fantastic. Thanks for the link. posted by Popular Ethics at 7:45 PM on July 2, 2012
"that old black police detective Abed was playing was right..." posted by dry white toast at 8:19 PM on July 2, 2012
The next time anyone says that their movie could have been better if only they had a bigger budget, I'm going to think about this short. Nothing more complicated than a white infinite and some minor special effects, but it was witty and clever and well-executed. posted by Sticherbeast at 11:43 AM on July 3, 2012
That was pretty good. I'm not sure I would have stayed to the end without the Danny Pudi mention in the post, but I'm glad I did. posted by Gordafarin at 12:46 AM on July 4, 2012
« Older "Legalizing pot would, in addition to engendering ... | Let it Bleed: Libertarianism a... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by bleep at 6:30 PM on July 2, 2012