Splunge:"Frank Sinatra? Why did you have to drag Sinatra into this?"
Where the claim is that the statute is overly broad in violation of the First Amendment, the Court has allowed a party to assert the rights of another without regard to the ability of the other to assert his own claim. The activity sought to be protected is at the heart of the business relationship between respondent and its customers, and respondent's interests in challenging the statute are completely consistent with the First Amendment interests of the charities it represents.
« Older If everyone had kept quiet, it could have been the... | Would the Northern and Souther... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt