<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 1193</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1193//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 1193</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 1193</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1193/</link>	
		<description>It looks like the Microsoft vs. DOJ case might be worth paying attention to again, as their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seattletimes.com/news/nation-world/html98/ttalk02_20000402.html&quot;&gt;settlement talks have ended&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;After more than four months, it is apparent that the disagreements among the parties . . . are too deep-seated to be bridged,&quot; said mediator, U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson will probably issue a verdict any day now.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.1193</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2000 23:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>endquote</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>SeattleTimes</category>		<category>Microsoft</category>		<category>DOJ</category>		<category>monopoly</category>		<category>settlement</category>		<category>litigation</category>		<category>USA</category>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
