Comments on: The Hamming Ambiguity (among other things)

The Hamming Ambiguity (among other things)

infini — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:50:37 -0800

Beyond the 10,000 Hour Rule: Richard Hamming and the Messy Art of Becoming Great

By: nanojath

nanojath — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:09:46 -0800

I refuse to accept that 10,000 hours are only necessary to become great, not sufficient. I am going to become a great virtuoso at this violin no longer how long I have to hit it with these drumsticks.

By: hanoixan

hanoixan — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:13:53 -0800

FTA: becoming excellent is not the result of a well-behaved tallying of hours, it instead emerges out of a swamp of roiling ambiguity

IMO this is very related to the advice people give in the vein of "forge your own path", and "be unique". Ambiguity is the teasing middle between a deterministic set of steps and a random walk. On one side, your work can't be completely random or you'll have no focus and get nothing done--but on the other, doing what everyone else is doing will never make you great since not everyone can be great. I am going to become a great virtuoso at this violin no longer how long I have to hit it with these drumsticks.

But you will become the best violin drummer in the world, and people will pay to see that. :)

By: nanojath

nanojath — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:23:57 -0800

Fooling aside this blog is a great find and this is a very interesting article (I just read Gladwell's Outliers and have been thinking a lot about what I do and don't so much agree with about it, so it was great timing for me.)

By: philip-random

philip-random — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:59:36 -0800

Yay! Everything is even more complex than I imagined. Seriously. I read this like I read the latest revelations as to just how big the Universe really is (it just keeps getting even bigger). Daunting as it may seem, it's also kind of reassuring. Embrace ambiguity. Learn to love paradox. It's as if life/the-universe/everything genuinely doesn't want its key secrets known, so you know you're getting close to something when the evidence suddenly pulls a strange loop on you. The trick is not to go mad with frustration, but to surf the turmoil, see where it takes you -- maybe some continent you never knew existed.

By: KokuRyu

KokuRyu — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:02:20 -0800

Interesting article, thanks for posting. The big takeaway for me is the observation that successful people spend more time each day being productive. Kind of a no-brainer, but it is important to remember.

By: TwoWordReview

TwoWordReview — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:22:37 -0800

To be fair to Gladwell and Ericsson (the author of the study the 10,000 hour rule is based on), I believe their thesis is that 10,000 hours of deliberate practice is necessary (not sufficient) for greatness. It's 10,000 hours of the right kind of practice, with instruction and correction as required. By saying that those "10,000 hours have to be invested in the right things" he's essentially restating the 10,000 hours theory.

By: yoink

yoink — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:27:56 -0800

The big takeaway for me is the observation that successful people spend more time each day being productive. This "being productive" of which you speak. That has something to do with chatting on Metafilter, right?

By: egypturnash

egypturnash — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:35:33 -0800

4. Seek Resistance: At the core of getting better is deliberate practice — stretching yourself beyond your current capability. This work is hard and draining, but also necessary. Seek this mental resistance. If you're not regularly experiencing long stretches of mind-melting hard focus, then you're wasting your time.

So true. Just the other week I was grumbling to myself that I feel like I haven't been learning anything in the process of doing my current graphic novel; I learnt some stuff in the first 4-5 chapters, but now I'm on 9 and I feel like the only challenge is focusing myself enough to keep up with my schedule.

By: samhyland

samhyland — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:39:25 -0800

75% of the way to mastering mindlessly surfing the internet. Must not give up now.

By: polymodus

polymodus — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:49:41 -0800

6. Loosen up a little.

By: onkyo

onkyo — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:52:02 -0800

"Hamming starts by emphasizing courage: "Once you get your courage up and believe that you can do important problems, then you can."" Aren't you think this sentence is so true? It reminds me an experience days ago on a waterpark (http://www.noahsarkwaterpark.com/). There was an item named "no return point," where a vertical tube of 50-100 meters was erected, and you just lay down there and fell down from the tube. However, I did not even have a thought of giving myself a try. The courage or self-confidence that we can do something important is at least crucial to me.

By: hot_monster

hot_monster — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:04:17 -0800

samhyland Pfft! Lightweight. I have at least 20k hours under my belt. When did you start surfing the web? Last month?

By: polymodus

polymodus — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:05:21 -0800

Based on this article, I find that the author has useful ideas for becoming a virtuoso. None of them are new, and the six rules-of-thumb can be summarized as: "nurture your learning-orientation skills". The problem is that this style of self-help advice is completely uncritical of its sociopolitical biases, assumptions, premises. #4 is laced with circular logic: to succeed, work long and hard. That is not news. So is #1: most people are small minded and they fear the unknown, and you should separate yourself from them. Really? What kind of privileged, male nerd logic is this? Hamming did not by any means have the whole picture, and to interpret the flaws in his talk as some sort of performative argument "[elegantly] capturing a crucial truth") is yet again lionizing a guru rather than seeing the imperfect human behind a human endeavor.

By: infini

infini — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:08:18 -0800

Thus, the ambiguity of it all, which itches and scratches those whose fields of expertise tend towards minimizing the same.

By: jb

jb — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:10:00 -0800

By saying that those "10,000 hours have to be invested in the right things" he's essentially restating the 10,000 hours theory. No, what he's saying is that what you work at matters. If I spend 10,000 hours working very deliberating on inventing calculus, I might succeed in inventing calculus, but no one will talk about "how great" I am because Newton and Leibniz already did that.

By: onwords

onwords — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:13:28 -0800

On the other hand I appreciate his thoughts on passion; my approach has been to try and think myself into meaningful work (i.e. "I am going to make this important to me, and commit the rest of my life to it"). I'd never considered that what has meaning for me only arises from my having put myself -- my effort, my time -- into something. So his suggestion to build up a "rare and valuable skill" seems like a sensible way to move forward. I guess I just need to decide now what the hell that skill is.

By: KokuRyu

KokuRyu — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:47:56 -0800

>The big takeaway for me is the observation that successful people spend more time each day being productive. This "being productive" of which you speak. That has something to do with chatting on Metafilter, right? Well, yeah.

By: kozad

kozad — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:04:19 -0800

This, like the 10,000 Hour Rule, John Cleese's lecture (all over the Net) (in which he recommends #6: lighten up a little and spend time daydreaming, essentially, in a OPEN mode before getting into a CLOSED or intense time of creativity), and John Cage's suggestions: All good.

By: lodurr

lodurr — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:30:36 -0800

By saying that those "10,000 hours have to be invested in the right things" he's essentially restating the 10,000 hours theory. Well, yeah. I mean, this is kind of the way things work, as I see it:

Useful message gets introduced.
Useful message gets simiplified for popular transmission.
Difficult parts of useful message get progressively stripped away as people re-transmit the parts
they find palatable, producing a straw-man version that still uses the same name as the original.
Useful message is re-introduced in the form of a condemnation of the straw man.

By: lodurr

lodurr — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:31:57 -0800

6. web-developer practices so much that he forgets how to copy & paste at the end of a line instead of in the middle.