<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Wet your whistle on these</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Wet your whistle on these</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:42:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Wet your whistle on these</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these</link>	
		<description>What ho, dearest cousins in the Western Colonies. You appear to be increasingly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19929249&quot;&gt;using the vernacular of the mother country&lt;/a&gt;. Splendid! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A few more examples to assist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sodahead.com/living/60-british-sayings/question-707093/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anglotopia.net/british-identity/humor/top-100-most-beautiful-british-slang-words-and-phrases/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodwords.com/sayings/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aznlover.com/community/showthread.php/519-British-slang-sayings.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Toodle pip.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wordshore</dc:creator>		<category>English</category>		<category>British</category>		<category>language</category>		<category>UK</category>		<category>USA</category>		<category>America</category>		<category>American</category>		<category>QueensEnglish</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Wordshore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627460</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Also, a reminder that as you&apos;re refinding your fondness for the proper language, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/120859/The-Senate-is-an-unknowing-world#4619127&quot;&gt;the offer stays open&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627460</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wordshore</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GenjiandProust</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627463</link>	
		<description>Well, the people of Newport, RI, insist that &quot;Thames&quot; is pronounced with the &quot;Th,&quot; that was how it was done in the 18th C, and the British have forgotten how to do it properly. No idea if that&apos;s correct, but, hey...

Some of these are kind of interesting as they exist only in sayings. Like knickers. I hear people say &quot;don&apos;t get your knickers in a twist,&quot; but I have never heard anyone use the word to refer to women&apos;s underwear outside of the phrase. Also, Nadine from Seattle missed the point. People do say panties in that expression, but apparently they &quot;bunch&quot; rather than &quot;twist.&quot; I suspect this has nothing to do with UK vs US undergarment design.
&lt;em&gt;
&quot;When I was in New York and waiting with an American friend to get into a bar, I called it a queue. She told me that in the US it was called a line. However, she commented that &apos;queue&apos; was becoming more common because of the use of the term &apos;printer queue&apos; in computing.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Isn&apos;t it &quot;on line?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627463</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:50:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GenjiandProust</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eriko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627464</link>	
		<description>This post is utterly pants.

&lt;small&gt;I keed, I keed!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627464</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eriko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: vacapinta</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627466</link>	
		<description>I prefer &apos;autumn&apos; and &apos;queue&apos; because their American equivalents &apos;fall&apos; and &apos;line&apos; are words overloaded with too many other meanings.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627466</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vacapinta</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: trip and a half</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627467</link>	
		<description>Eponysterical, old bean!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627467</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>trip and a half</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mannequito</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627469</link>	
		<description>Speaking as a Canadian, my head just imploded.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627469</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:59:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mannequito</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mizu</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627470</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m all for it, especially if we can encourage the damn kids to start saying &quot;fancy&quot; as a replacement for the hideous scourge of &quot;like-like&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627470</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mizu</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627474</link>	
		<description>This being self-reported/crowdsourced/anecdotal I&apos;m a little skeptical. For instance, cheeky is a word I suppose has been used &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; in the UK but always existed here. The term &quot;flat&quot; has had currency in certain urban environments, e.g. the two-flat or four-flat building, even if the word &quot;apartment&quot; is more universally known. I think some words like &quot;row&quot; have also had regional currency. The word &quot;holiday&quot; vs. &quot;vacation&quot; has had a class separation in the US. Aside from the handful of obvious affectations (&quot;bloody&quot;, &quot;gobsmacked&quot;, &quot;mate&quot;), I&apos;ll allow that certain words have been migrating into more common usage here (&quot;frock&quot;, &quot;kit&quot;) but largely because of net-universal jargon usage -- e.g. a bicyclist&apos;s kit meaning not their gear so much as their spandex outfit.

I cannot remember a time when the word &quot;twit&quot; was not used.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627474</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:05:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bardic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627475</link>	
		<description>&quot;Speaking as a Canadian, my head just imploded.&quot;

Eh?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627475</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:06:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bardic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: knile</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627477</link>	
		<description>Linguist Lynne Murphy, an American who&apos;s lived in Britain for years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.nl/2012/10/briticisms-in-ame.html&quot;&gt;has discussed this&lt;/a&gt; rather nicely, with a roundup of links to some of the other  mainstream media coverage of this &quot;phenomenon&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627477</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>knile</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Segundus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627478</link>	
		<description>Sounds a bit twee, guv.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627478</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:08:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Segundus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bardic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627479</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m glad the article mentioned &lt;em&gt;Austin Powers&lt;/em&gt; because seriously try and remember just how many American asshole dudes walked around college/grad school campuses for a year saying stupid shit like &quot;Do I make you ho-nee, baby?&quot; and &quot;Let&apos;s shag!&quot;

At least, that was my nightmare.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627479</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:10:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bardic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TristanWood</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627483</link>	
		<description>Nice to see some of the sayings cross the pond :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627483</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:27:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TristanWood</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Renoroc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627485</link>	
		<description>We are also using her alphabet</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627485</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:28:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Renoroc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gracedissolved</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627487</link>	
		<description>&quot;Wonky&quot; is the only one I know I&apos;ve adopted myself because it is really sometimes the best possible word.  When you&apos;ve just had to reconnect six times, &quot;sorry, my wireless is wonky&quot; seems to do much better with denoting that it is an inexplicable and probably unfixable problem.  &quot;My wireless is unstable&quot; implies I need a new router or maybe I have a configuration issue.  Wonky implies that I need to go glower at it for awhile, give it a stern talking-to, unplug it until it says it&apos;s sorry, and then it&apos;ll probably be okay for awhile longer.

&quot;Twit&quot;, according to dictionary.com, appears in an American slang dictionary, so I think that one might just be wrong about it being British.  I&apos;m also really not sure about whether &quot;autumn&quot; fits at all, and &quot;proper&quot; with their given definition isn&apos;t, but &quot;proper&quot; to mean &quot;really good&quot; or &quot;really big&quot; might be.  I might refer to a proper breakfast as opposed to my usual entirely improper habit of, at best, eating dry cereal straight out of the box while reading RSS feeds, but I don&apos;t think I&apos;ve ever referred to someone as a proper idiot.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627487</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:31:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gracedissolved</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MuffinMan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627488</link>	
		<description>Q. What do you call an ass with 3 legs?

A. A wonkey.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627488</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:34:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MuffinMan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Acey</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627490</link>	
		<description>From the article: &lt;em&gt;I&apos;ve never heard a Englishman say &apos;dude&apos;&lt;/em&gt;

Dude, come off it. I say it all the time. 

Some notable omissions:

&lt;strong&gt;Dodgy,&lt;em&gt; adj.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; suspect, suspicious, unreliable (see also: sketchy)
&lt;strong&gt;Reckon, &lt;em&gt;v.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; opine, conclude</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627490</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:36:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Acey</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: subbes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627495</link>	
		<description>This sort of affectation drives me &lt;em&gt;mental&lt;/em&gt;.  

(Mainly because as a Brit in the Former Colony, people start using these words at me to be &quot;funny,&quot; as if they&apos;re the first ones ever to think of doing it.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627495</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:49:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>subbes</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gracedissolved</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627497</link>	
		<description>Looking more at the other lists, now... elbow grease?  Not a Britishism. &quot;Piece of cake&quot; was ours first, I&apos;m pretty sure.  &quot;Do it yourself&quot;?  Seriously?  We have DIY, too.  In a way, sort of interesting to see what people think is unique.

I&apos;m pretty sure the Good Words list isn&apos;t English-as-in-England, it&apos;s English-as-in-the-shared-language, despite the page design.  At least, I hope nobody thinks that Americans haven&apos;t heard of tying the knot, going on honeymoon, or doing spring cleaning.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627497</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:53:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gracedissolved</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: three blind mice</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627499</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Kit, n. A collection of personal effects or necessities. &quot;I&apos;ve noticed the adoption of the British term &apos;kit&apos; for what athletes wear, in the place of what we Americans would generally call a &apos;uniform&apos; or &apos;gear&apos;&lt;/i&gt;

He&apos;s noticed wrong. The only way Americans use &quot;kit&quot; is together with the words &quot;whole&quot; and &quot;caboodle.&quot; Or as something you assemble.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627499</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:57:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>three blind mice</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dunkadunc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627500</link>	
		<description>I blame Red Dwarf, Doctor Who, The IT Crowd, Nathan Barley, Father Ted, et cetera.

I might well be using tons of britishisms and not realize it because it seems natural to me. I said &quot;We haven&apos;t got&quot; to a customer once and she lambasted me for using incorrect English. Not so.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627500</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Flashman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627503</link>	
		<description>Swings and roundabouts innit</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627503</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flashman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: escabeche</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627506</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;From the article: I&apos;ve never heard a Englishman say &apos;dude&apos;&lt;/em&gt;

This person needs to watch more &lt;em&gt;Peep Show&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627506</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:11:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>escabeche</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: This Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627511</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627490&quot;&gt;Acey&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;i&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Reckon, &lt;em&gt;v.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; opine, conclude&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

This one is very regional in the US.  I&apos;d suggest (reckon) that it&apos;s very strongly correlated with a heavy Southern/Texan accent and I heard it all the time growing up in Alabama.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627511</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:30:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>This Guy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nile_red</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627512</link>	
		<description>Reckon is something I grew up as a twangy southern thing and so had stayed away from using it. I was SHOCKED to hear my British co-worker using it regularly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627512</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:30:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nile_red</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nile_red</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627516</link>	
		<description>(ham) This Guy over here knows what I&apos;m talking about. *nudge nudge* (/ham)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627516</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:32:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nile_red</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: daniel_charms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627517</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Swings and roundabouts innit
&lt;/em&gt;
I think the confusion over the word &apos;roundabout&apos; (and the difficulty in navigating one) is caused mostly by the fact that until quite recently, &lt;em&gt;there were none&lt;/em&gt; in the US. According to Wikipedia, the first &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundabout#Differences_from_traditional_traffic_circles&quot;&gt;modern roundabout&lt;/a&gt; in the US was built only in 1990, so it&apos;s no wonder that people still can&apos;t tell a roundabout from a traffic circle.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627517</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:33:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel_charms</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nile_red</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627520</link>	
		<description>Watching BBC has skewed my mental English, but I&apos;m not confident enough to just come out with things like &quot;swan off&quot; for fear of it sounding like an obvious affectation.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627520</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nile_red</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aeshnid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627525</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Q. What do you call an ass with 3 legs?&lt;/em&gt;

That would be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://Q.%20What%20do%20you%20call%20an%20ass%20with%203%20legs?&quot;&gt;wonky donkey&lt;/a&gt; shurely?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627525</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:50:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aeshnid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EnterTheStory</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627527</link>	
		<description>@vacapinta &quot;I prefer &apos;autumn&apos; and &apos;queue&apos; because their American equivalents &apos;fall&apos; and &apos;line&apos; are words overloaded with too many other meanings.&quot;

Eventually everyone will autumn into queue.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627527</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:53:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EnterTheStory</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Slade</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627530</link>	
		<description>The interesting thing about &quot;innit&quot; is how far its British use has stretched beyond the initial contraction of &quot;isn&apos;t it&quot;. It&apos;s now used as a postscript to any statement where you&apos;re inviting the listener to agree with you.

For example:

&quot;They always go on their holidays to Spain, innit?&quot; (Innit = &quot;don&apos;t they&quot;).
&quot;I would have called him later, innit?&quot; (Innit = &quot;wouldn&apos;t I?&quot;)
&quot;They&apos;ve always got a choice, innit?&quot; (Innit = &quot;haven&apos;t they?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627530</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:55:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Slade</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: daniel_charms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627534</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Ali G: You wanna know &apos;ow I make diz country bettah? Iz simple, two words: keep it real!
Cabinet M.P.: That&apos;s three words!
Ali G: Don&apos;t be a spannah, it ain&apos;t a real word. It&apos;s short for innit, innit?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627534</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel_charms</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: A Thousand Baited Hooks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627535</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/bollocks/&quot;&gt;Interesting&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;(via kniles&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.nl/2012/10/briticisms-in-ame.html&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

That has to be the first time I&apos;ve seen a beer explicitly marketed on the basis that it lacks testicles.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627535</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:58:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Thousand Baited Hooks</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: drezdn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627542</link>	
		<description>No, No, No, No, No. Yes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627542</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:04:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drezdn</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: LondonYank</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627547</link>	
		<description>Oh yes, &quot;Dude&quot; is surely used over here. 

Mostly in a semi-ironic way, by public schoolboys who have grown up to be social media strategists and now live in Dalston.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627547</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:05:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LondonYank</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627548</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll cop to using &quot;bloody&quot; quite a lot. Especially &quot;bloody hell&quot;. It&apos;s a great intensifier to use when &quot;fucking&quot; would be inappropriate.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627548</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mwhybark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627549</link>	
		<description>the orgin vector for the Beeb story appears to be the us-based language blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://britishisms.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;Not One-Off Britishisms.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627549</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mwhybark</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: steef</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627550</link>	
		<description>&apos;Numpty&apos;? Surely that&apos;s not a thing. It&apos;s just a mountweazel implanted to see who scrapes their content and reposts it elsewhere.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627550</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steef</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Partario</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627552</link>	
		<description>Wonky is a Britishism? I (an American English speaker) said something was wonky to a coworker here in London the other day, and she said, &apos;Ha, hardly ever hear that word.&apos; I think there may be more overlap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627552</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:08:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Partario</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627553</link>	
		<description>For about 7 years I lived with some guys who were born in the US to British parents and lived for a significant time in each place.  They spoke mostly-British English with American accents.  I picked up some strange linguistic habits during those years, at least in part because I heard Britishisms spoken in the local accent so constantly.

(Note: nobody in the US understands &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks,&quot; although &quot;the mutt&apos;s nuts&quot; has a slightly higher success rate. Likewise, &quot;bollocks&quot; itself as a verb is only occasionally understood, although as an interjection it seems to go over just fine.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627553</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:08:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ghharr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627557</link>	
		<description>I hear people using &quot;bloody&quot; in the US occasionally.  It always sounds weird and forced.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627557</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:13:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ghharr</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jontyjago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627562</link>	
		<description>Fall for autumn was the word used in Britain 500 or so years ago and the Pilgrim Fathers took it with them when they headed across the Atlantic where it&apos;s still used today. On the British side it then fell out of use and autumn took over. 

If it hasn&apos;t been mentioned already, Bill Bryson&apos;s Mother Tongue is a great read on the differences between US and UK English.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627562</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jontyjago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ROU_Xenophobe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627565</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We are also using her alphabet&lt;/i&gt;

Reperies, credo Romanis litteris utimur.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627565</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:25:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ROU_Xenophobe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: guy72277</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627573</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;We are also using her alphabet&lt;/em&gt;

Nope, Zed&apos;s dead baby, Zed&apos;s dead.....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627573</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:29:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>guy72277</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EmpressCallipygos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627577</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;nobody in the US understands &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot;....&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;d actually love an explanation as to why this is considered to be a &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; thing.  Because dog balls aren&apos;t something I&apos;ve considered getting all happy about.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627577</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:32:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmpressCallipygos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627586</link>	
		<description>This trend is naff and needs to sod off.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627586</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:40:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Egg Shen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: guy72277</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627589</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;nobody in the US understands &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot;....

I&apos;d actually love an explanation as to why this is considered to be a good thing. Because dog balls aren&apos;t something I&apos;ve considered getting all happy about.&lt;/em&gt;

Nor are kipper&apos;s tits....

For the phrase &quot;it&apos;s the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot;, I&apos;ve always found it strange that if you remove &quot;the dog&apos;s&quot; and just say &quot;it&apos;s bollocks&quot;, it means totally the opposite.... Blighty&apos;s post-Norman tongue is bizarre.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627589</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>guy72277</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grangousier</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627592</link>	
		<description>My personal favourite is the increasing uptake of the phrase &quot;can&apos;t be arsed&quot;, not (for some reason) mentioned here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627592</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:43:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grangousier</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: drezdn</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627595</link>	
		<description>My wife and I spent the summer/autumn watching a bunch of Brit-Coms off Netflix and Amazon. I was just telling her last night that I was going to start using innit.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627595</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:44:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drezdn</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rubyrudy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627599</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;d actually love an explanation as to why this is considered to be a good thing. Because dog balls aren&apos;t something I&apos;ve considered getting all happy about.&lt;/em&gt;

Because the dogs bollocks are clearly The Best Thing Ever. Why else would they spend so much time licking them?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627599</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rubyrudy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Segundus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627601</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/120959/howtonotgiveafuckcom&quot;&gt;How to not give a fuck&lt;/a&gt;

Don&apos;t be arsed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627601</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:46:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Segundus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627602</link>	
		<description>How about the construction, &quot;It&apos;s all a bit [fill in the blank], innit?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627602</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627603</link>	
		<description>I have trouble separating bc my SO is British-Canadian and I&apos;ve lived in the UK - brought back &quot;flat&quot; and &quot;trousers&quot; but already had &quot;bloody&quot; thanks to Spike on &lt;em&gt;Buffy&lt;/em&gt;. But my decidedly Canadian-only family has never used &quot;butt&quot;, only &quot;bum&quot;. &quot;Butt&quot; is a word for rude teenagers, &quot;bum&quot; for children and parents.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627603</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:48:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Benny Andajetz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627608</link>	
		<description>Such colourful language.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627608</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benny Andajetz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: peacrow</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627612</link>	
		<description>My BFF is American but spent her formative years in London. She is the only American I know who can use Britishisms without it sounding terribly affected.

An ex regularly used &quot;shag&quot;. Made me feel like I was sleeping with Austin bloody Powers.

Are autumn and bum Britishisms? I think they are just English...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627612</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 05:58:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacrow</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GenjiandProust</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627619</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;(Mainly because as a Brit in the Former Colony, people start using these words at me to be &quot;funny,&quot; as if they&apos;re the first ones ever to think of doing it.)&lt;/em&gt;

Considering how sympathizers with the Crown used to be treated, I&apos;d count my blessings. Of course, the American sense of Humor has progressed somewhat from the late 18th C. (I say &lt;em&gt;somewhat&lt;/em&gt;.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627619</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:06:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GenjiandProust</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gilrain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627632</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627517&quot;&gt;daniel_charms&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/em&gt; I think the confusion over the word &apos;roundabout&apos; (and the difficulty in navigating one) is caused mostly by the fact that until quite recently, there were none in the US.&lt;/small&gt;

In that expression, &quot;roundabouts&quot; is referring to fairground merry-go-rounds, not circular intersections.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627632</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilrain</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tommasz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627633</link>	
		<description>I blame PBS and Netflix. 

Sorry.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627633</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:14:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tommasz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Damienmce</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627636</link>	
		<description>Easy bruv</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627636</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:16:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damienmce</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Deej</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627641</link>	
		<description>Growing up in Detroit in the 60s and 70s, everyone commonly  used &quot;flat&quot; to describe a unit within a multi-family house. The most common usage was &quot;two-family flat&quot; which is what I would now call a &quot;duplex.&quot; There could also be &quot;four-family flats.&quot;  However, the use of &quot;flats&quot; seemed to only refer to a low number of units within what appeared to be traditional-looking houses. Units within an obvious apartment building were always called apartments.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627641</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:19:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Deej</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627643</link>	
		<description>My mother (an editor) has been noting this for years, and has her own personal list. Some of them are far more subtle than this - including the phrase in which we say someone or something &apos;went missing,&apos; which wasn&apos;t American usage until fairly recently. Another is &quot;a coffee,&quot; as in &quot;let&apos;s go get a coffee,&quot; which replaced the American &quot;let&apos;s go get a cup of coffee&quot; starting in the mid-90s. 

I blame the internet. We exchanged TV programs before it came along, but it was always really affected to borrow Anglicisms from TV shows (it showed you watched PBS and considered yourself a sort of &apos;alternative.&apos;) But with the internet, we can all just read anything Anglophone, and we all come across a lot more English written content that didn&apos;t originate in North America. IT doesn&apos;t surprise us to read or hear them any more, even if we know in my hearts that we never used the phrase &quot;went on holiday&quot; in our lives before the last decade.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627643</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:21:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: psoas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627644</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are autumn and bum Britishisms? I think they are just English...&lt;/i&gt;

In the US, &quot;bum&quot; means a derelict. I understand the Brits use it approximately the same way we do &quot;fanny&quot; (which, again, here is considered a &lt;i&gt;polite&lt;/i&gt;, old-maidy euphemism for &quot;butt&quot;).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627644</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:22:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>psoas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ambient2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627650</link>	
		<description>wanky</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627650</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ambient2</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jehan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627651</link>	
		<description>They didn&apos;t list wanker or wank (maybe for obvious reasons), but I read that word a lot from US folks. Though I wish it were us giving up &quot;autumn&quot; than others picking it up. It has always sounded like a pretentious word to me. Round my way many locals call it &quot;backend&quot;, and so &quot;autumn&quot; just sounds stupidly posh in comparison.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Wonky&quot; is the only one I know I&apos;ve adopted myself because it is really sometimes the best possible word. When you&apos;ve just had to reconnect six times, &quot;sorry, my wireless is wonky&quot; seems to do much better with denoting that it is an inexplicable and probably unfixable problem. &quot;My wireless is unstable&quot; implies I need a new router or maybe I have a configuration issue. Wonky implies that I need to go glower at it for awhile, give it a stern talking-to, unplug it until it says it&apos;s sorry, and then it&apos;ll probably be okay for awhile longer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&apos;t know about the whole of England, but certainly in the parts I know we wouldn&apos;t say &quot;wonky&quot; for this, but &quot;dodgy&quot;. &quot;Wonky&quot; means physically uneven or unstable. Interesting.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, the people of Newport, RI, insist that &quot;Thames&quot; is pronounced with the &quot;Th,&quot; that was how it was done in the 18th C, and the British have forgotten how to do it properly. No idea if that&apos;s correct, but, hey...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The &quot;t&quot; pronunciation is original, not the &quot;th&quot;. The river was called &lt;em&gt;Temes&lt;/em&gt; in Old English.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627651</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:24:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jehan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627652</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;wonky to a coworker here in London the other day, and she said, &apos;Ha, hardly ever hear that word.&apos;&lt;/em&gt;

I actually think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wonk.com/WonkDefined.htm&quot;&gt;American wonky&lt;/a&gt; and British wonky are different, and it gets confusing. In the US we can say somebody is wonky if they&apos;re a policy wonk or data wonk - another version of geek, except more political. The Britishism is more for equipment that&apos;s about to fail or doesn&apos;t work well.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627652</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:25:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627654</link>	
		<description>Data point, the Thames River in New London, CT, is also called &quot;Thames,&quot; rhyming with James, with the full th- .</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627654</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:25:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kitteh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627659</link>	
		<description>I think Britishisms have been in my personal vernacular for, oh, I dunno, nearly twenty years (mostly because I was an Anglophile since I was a little kid much to the confusion of anyone in the suburban American South). But even now, though I do use them, I use them in a proper context. All too often I have seen people on Facebook who clump them all together and it just sounds weird and all a mess. As though they think because they&apos;ve seen Attack the Block or whatever that makes them Sarf London hardcore. 

(Also, chav is offensive and I will slap an American that uses it.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627659</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kitteh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: psoas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627660</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;When I was in New York and waiting with an American friend to get into a bar, I called it a queue. She told me that in the US it was called a line. However, she commented that &apos;queue&apos; was becoming more common because of the use of the term &apos;printer queue&apos; in computing.&quot;

Isn&apos;t it &quot;on line?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

G&amp;amp;P, can you explain what &quot;it&quot; is here? I honestly can&apos;t parse this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627660</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:26:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>psoas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kinnakeet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627664</link>	
		<description>Speaking only for my New England gang, we picked up and actively used lots of phrases from Monty Python back in the late 70s. Teens love catch phrases and we integrated them right alongside Steve Martin and SNL. I recall greeting friends in the cafeteria with &quot;what&apos;s all this then?&quot; and thinking nothing of it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627664</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kinnakeet</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627666</link>	
		<description>I think Genji and Prost are referring to the NY/NJ/CT Metro usage for waiting a turn in line. People from the region (such as me) will use the phrase &quot;on line&quot; interchangeably with &quot;in line.&quot; It&apos;s not a huge difference, but apparently &quot;on line&quot; sounds funny to people from the hinterlands. 

I didn&apos;t know until maybe 5 years ago that this was a regional marker - I used the phrase where I lived in NH, and an aquaintance (who didn&apos;t know my background) said &quot;So, what part of New Jersey are you from?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627666</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:29:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627668</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;we picked up and actively used lots of phrases from Monty Python back in the late 70&lt;/em&gt;

I did too, but that comes under the affectedness I mentioned before. Intentionally adopting phrases like that as a marker of pride in difference is something teenagers have done for a long time. But that&apos;s not the same phenomenon as having colloquialisms creep into unconscious mainstream usage from sources the users can&apos;t remember or identify.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627668</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:31:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EmpressCallipygos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627669</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Speaking only for my New England gang, we picked up and actively used lots of phrases from Monty Python back in the late 70s. Teens love catch phrases and we integrated them right alongside Steve Martin and SNL. &lt;/em&gt;

Same with my gang in CT in the 80&apos;s.  We even incorporated a few catchphrases from the &lt;em&gt;Secret Policeman&apos;s Other Ball&lt;/em&gt; show.  And don&apos;t even get me started on &lt;em&gt;Hitchhikers&lt;/em&gt; references.

I&apos;m not so sure it&apos;s &quot;Americans&quot; incorporating British slang so much as it&apos;s &quot;American &lt;em&gt;geeks&lt;/em&gt;&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627669</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:31:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmpressCallipygos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: daniel_charms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627677</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;In that expression, &quot;roundabouts&quot; is referring to fairground merry-go-rounds, not circular intersections.
&lt;/em&gt;
Eh, live and learn.

(I was actually referring to the article anyway)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627677</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel_charms</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: symbioid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627678</link>	
		<description>Dude - a couple days ago, I had this weird thing where I kept using Britishisms...  I made a post on facebook, here&apos;s what I wrote...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Lord help me, I just caught myself, when reading about x, y, z coordinates, saying &quot;zed&quot; instead of &quot;zee&quot; HALP I&apos;m becoming British!

Before you know it I&apos;ll be saying things like queue, petrol and... worst of all &quot;different to&quot;...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Then my friend said &quot;you&apos;ll know you&apos;ve reached the point of no return when you start mispronouncing aluminum, and I shit you not... 

I READ IT AS ALUMINIUM!

That said, I really do like &quot;bloody&quot; and have loved since I was a wee lad.  I&apos;m especially fond of &quot;bloody &apos;ell&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627678</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:33:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>symbioid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627680</link>	
		<description>No, the copyeditor in me is going to insist this isn&apos;t geek mimicry we&apos;re talking about. Certainly, TV and movie from the UK play a part in introducing what are neologisms in American. But there&apos;s also a big part of this that reflects changing colloquial mainstream usage, not just self-conscious language play.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627680</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:33:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kitteh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627689</link>	
		<description>I knew that I was part of the Commonwealth now when my iPad started correcting all words that ended in &quot;or&quot; to &quot;our&quot; and &quot;ense&quot; to &quot;ence.&quot; I am waiting to see what it does to words in &quot;ize&quot; by the next upgrade, because I swear to you it never ever did that in the past year.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627689</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:37:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kitteh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: symbioid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627697</link>	
		<description>I use wonky as I heard on Red Dwarf with the Despair Squid.  I never use wonky to mean &quot;wonkish&quot; as in &quot;Wonkette is rather wonkish&quot; but never &quot;Wonkette is rather wonky&quot;... &quot;Actin&apos; a bit wonky today.&quot; is certainly more like something I&apos;d say.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627697</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>symbioid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627698</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;apparently &quot;on line&quot; sounds funny to people from the hinterlands&lt;/em&gt;

As someone from &quot;the tri-state area&quot; who also says &quot;on line&quot;, I must insist on the correctness of our usage.

A line is a one-dimensional entity. It is a topological impossibility for a three-dimensional entity to be &quot;in&quot; it.

Imagine you&apos;ve drawn a line on the floor and you want someone to stand over it. Are you going to stay &quot;stand in that line&quot;? Or are you going to say &quot;stand on that line&quot;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627698</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:40:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Egg Shen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: psoas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627703</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think Genji and Prost are referring to the NY/NJ/CT Metro usage for waiting a turn in line. People from the region (such as me) will use the phrase &quot;on line&quot; interchangeably with &quot;in line.&quot; It&apos;s not a huge difference, but apparently &quot;on line&quot; sounds funny to people from the hinterlands.&lt;/i&gt;

It does sound funny to me (since I do only hear that usage from people in that area), but I was more puzzled because I thought the distinction being made was between the nouns &quot;queue&quot; and &quot;line&quot; (regardless of preposition) and couldn&apos;t figure out if &quot;on line&quot; was supposed to refer to the &quot;printer queue&quot; designation and now I&apos;ve confused myself again I think.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627703</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>psoas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ostro</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627704</link>	
		<description>Is &quot;an item&quot; specifically British?  I always thought of it as a Valley-girl thing.  And I think some of these have always existed in the US, but with pretty specific connotations -- &quot;autumn&quot; is slightly formal, &quot;bum&quot; is homey and childish.  &quot;Frock&quot; is more or less the preserve of cutesy clothing stores.  (I&apos;m looking at you, Modcloth.  Please don&apos;t try to make me vomit as I browse your dresses.)

Also, I think the reason this trend drives so many Americans nuts isn&apos;t because the phrases are associated with England, it&apos;s because they&apos;re associated with British TV and the kind of people who think that watching it means that they&apos;re more worldly and enlightened than everybody else.   Particularly jarring when you hear things way outside their original class context.  The slang that really is filtering pretty naturally into US English seems to be the less colorful stuff, like &quot;queue&quot; or &quot;ginger,&quot; as opposed to exclamations or interjections.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627704</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:43:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ostro</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627711</link>	
		<description>Now that I think about it, I&apos;m surprised that the British don&apos;t have many words for &quot;queue&quot; - just as the Eskimos have many words for &quot;snow&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627711</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:46:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Egg Shen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627712</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;couldn&apos;t figure out if &quot;on line&quot; was supposed to refer to the &quot;printer queue&quot; designation&lt;/em&gt;

No, it read to me like he was just extrapolating from the mention of &quot;line.&quot; We don&apos;t use &quot;line&quot; for anything to do with the print queue.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627712</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:46:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hoyland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627714</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll believe this when I go a year without being made fun of (to my face!) for saying one of these things. See also the fact that my pronunciation of &apos;yogurt&apos;, &apos;pasta&apos; and &apos;been&apos; is totally unacceptable to Americans. Oh, add &apos;phone&apos; as a verb to the list, too.

(Also, Roald Dahl wrote a book called &lt;i&gt;The Twits&lt;/i&gt;. Surely this would be a natural route for the word to find its way into American English.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627714</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hoyland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jquinby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627715</link>	
		<description>One that I seem to have picked up is declaring &apos;Right!&apos; whenever it&apos;s time to get up and go do something, like charging into the cannon-fire or starting to clean the kitchen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627715</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jquinby</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ocschwar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627721</link>	
		<description>&quot;Flat&quot; instead of apartment was established Chicago usage for a long time, since &quot;3-flat&quot; is the term for the standard Chicago tenement. Dates at least to the 1980&apos;s.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627721</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:51:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ocschwar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lauranesson</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627722</link>	
		<description>I really like &quot;knackered,&quot; but I definitely can&apos;t get away with saying it. &quot;Quite&quot; has been sneaking its way into my speech, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627722</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:53:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lauranesson</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: los pantalones del muerte</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627730</link>	
		<description>If I remember the story correctly, the term &apos;roundabout&apos; for that smaller variant of the traffic circle was popularized/invented by an American working for the BBC back in the 20s or 30s.  Before that, the story went, the British called them &apos;gyratory circuses&apos;.  

Britain, you&apos;re welcome.  Because, come on&#8212;gyratory circus?  So it&apos;s not Anglocreep really, but us just re-appropriating one of our own.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627730</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:58:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>los pantalones del muerte</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: the quidnunc kid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627733</link>	
		<description>Whan longen folk (who wonynge fer by weste) to speak the tonge of Engelond, thay moote yeve heed to the spelling, that thay be evere honoured for theyre worthynesse.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627733</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:58:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the quidnunc kid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lauranesson</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627736</link>	
		<description>That&apos;s it! My Halloween costume! Sexy Gyratory Circus!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627736</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lauranesson</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Wordshore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627765</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Oppa Gyratory Circus&lt;/em&gt; ... no, even Psy can&apos;t make something sexy-sounding out of that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627765</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:09:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wordshore</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tyllwin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627772</link>	
		<description>I gotta tell you, once they put four roundabouts just down the road from you, and you get used to saying &quot;roundabout,&quot; turning it into &quot;bloody roundabout&quot; seems pretty damned natural.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627772</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tyllwin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Atreides</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627786</link>	
		<description>I just say stupid roundabout and I say it increasingly more every year.  The damn things are populating the United States like rabbits.  I lived in Surrey for a year and it&apos;s completely inconvenient to navigate to destinations with routes that avoid the major ones.  Thus, my irritation at their growing prevalence, born in their native country, which is compounded by the fact that they can be handy replacements for certain intersections. Meh!


And as noted above, fall is the good original term.  While autumn has an eloquence and the serenity of yellowed maple leaves carpeting a still green lawn in morning sunlight, it&apos;s still just a foreign tramp of a word imposing itself with its fancy use of two vowels.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627786</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:18:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atreides</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mfu</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627787</link>	
		<description>Is &apos;sprog&apos; a britishism? That&apos;s what we called our bundle of cells before it exploded into the world a screaming, pooping, mass of awesome.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627787</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:18:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mfu</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627798</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I just say stupid roundabout and I say it increasingly more every year. The damn things are populating the United States like rabbits.&lt;/em&gt;

I like the word for &apos;em in New England: rotary. In New Jersey we called them &quot;traffic circles,&quot; which was fine, but rotary just sounds like more fun, besides being fewer syllables.

They&apos;re proliferating because research shows they&apos;re actually safer than multilane controlled-turn intersections.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627798</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:23:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ocschwar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627800</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The interesting thing about &quot;innit&quot; is how far its British use has stretched beyond the initial contraction of &quot;isn&apos;t it&quot;. It&apos;s now used as a postscript to any statement where you&apos;re inviting the listener to agree with you.
&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;Innit&quot; is a also a piece of Indian Reservation slang. I was hearing it in New Mexico long before my friends in the Too-Damn-Much-PBS crowd were using it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627800</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:24:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ocschwar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ocschwar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627803</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;They&apos;re proliferating because research shows they&apos;re actually safer than multilane controlled-turn intersections.
&lt;/em&gt;

And they&apos;re called roundabouts because the new ones are deliberately made to be tighter than the old New England rotaries.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627803</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:25:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ocschwar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EmpressCallipygos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627814</link>	
		<description>Then again, there are those people who hear the word &quot;roundabout&quot; and think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tdu4uKSZ3M&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; instead.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627814</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmpressCallipygos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627819</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And they&apos;re called roundabouts because the new ones are deliberately made to be tighter than the old New England rotaries.&lt;/em&gt;

Really? Can you provide background? I would have assumed that it was just regionalism. Because even New England rotaries are designed quite differently now than they were 20 years ago - it&apos;s not as though &quot;rotary&quot; is a specific design, it&apos;s just a concept.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627819</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627824</link>	
		<description>You must be referring to &lt;a href=&quot;http://In%20the%20U.S.,%20many%20people%20use%20the%20terms%20%22roundabout%22,%20%22traffic%20circle%22,%20and%20%22rotary%22%20interchangeably,%20and%20they%20are%20defined%20as%20synonyms%20in%20dictionaries.[13]%20This%20is%20the%20reason%20for%20the%20distinction%20made%20when%20engineers%20use%20the%20term,%20%22modern%20roundabout%22.%20Many%20old%20traffic%20circles%20remain%20in%20the%20northeastern%20US.%20Since%20many%20of%20the%20older%20junction%20forms%20have%20unfavourable%20safety%20records,%20transportation%20professionals%20are%20careful%20to%20use%20%22roundabout%22%20when%20referring%20to%20the%20newer%20designs%20and%20%22traffic%20circle%22%20or%20%22rotary%22%20when%20referring%20to%20ones%20that%20do%20not%20meet%20the%20criteria%20listed%20above.&quot;&gt;this sort of usage&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the U.S., many people use the terms &quot;roundabout&quot;, &quot;traffic circle&quot;, and &quot;rotary&quot; interchangeably, and they are defined as synonyms in dictionaries.[13] This is the reason for the distinction made when engineers use the term, &quot;modern roundabout&quot;. Many old traffic circles remain in the northeastern US. Since many of the older junction forms have unfavourable safety records, transportation professionals are careful to use &quot;roundabout&quot; when referring to the newer designs and &quot;traffic circle&quot; or &quot;rotary&quot; when referring to ones that do not meet the criteria listed above.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&apos;d still say, whether an engineer would call them &quot;modern roundabouts&quot; or not, in New England they are all still called rotaries.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627824</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:33:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627835</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m musing over the fact that they say &quot;in hospital&quot; rather than &quot;in the hospital&quot;. 

I suspect the availability of government health care is involved.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627835</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:38:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Egg Shen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jquinby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627838</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Then again, there are those people who hear the word &quot;roundabout&quot; and think of this  instead.&lt;/em&gt;

I reflexively sing &quot;In and around the lake,&quot; out loud, every time I have to merge into one, and &quot;...mountains come out of the sky&quot; when exiting. I have to, it&apos;s the law.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627838</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jquinby</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627846</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I suspect the availability of government health care is involved.&lt;/em&gt;

It goes back to before that, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627846</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:44:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Eyebrows McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627850</link>	
		<description>I hear American schoolchildren say &quot;Brilliant!&quot; a lot when they like things, for which I blame Harry Potter. Totally unironic and unaffected. It&apos;s pretty cute.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627850</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eyebrows McGee</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gracedissolved</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627865</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&apos;t know about the whole of England, but certainly in the parts I know we wouldn&apos;t say &quot;wonky&quot; for this, but &quot;dodgy&quot;. &quot;Wonky&quot; means physically uneven or unstable. Interesting.&lt;/i&gt;

See, and I intentionally picked it up from British internet friends in the mid-90s about ongoing adventures in laggy connections and dialup, and never really thought about it after that.  Given that everybody I knew was kind of part of the same group--probably an internet-subcultural thing that I figured was more universal.  Which is an interesting element of language drift, when you&apos;re picking things up from people who already aren&apos;t quite standard...

Granted, I should be more aware of this, I always forget, too, that nobody outside my little geographic area in the real world refers to that piece of grass in front of the house as the devil strip.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627865</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gracedissolved</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627872</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;that piece of grass in front of the house&lt;/em&gt;

What, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tree_lawn&quot;&gt;tree lawn?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627872</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:55:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627876</link>	
		<description>Americans don&apos;t say &quot;autumn&quot;? This feels like when I discovered &quot;washroom&quot; will get you funny looks in parts of the US, and you should say &quot;bathroom&quot; even if there&apos;s no bath, or &quot;restroom&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627876</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:58:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627884</link>	
		<description>We say &apos;autumn&apos; but it&apos;s considered more formal than &apos;fall.&apos; You go back to school in the fall.

&lt;em&gt; &quot;washroom&quot; will get you funny looks in parts of the US&lt;/em&gt;

What parts? I sometimes say that one and have never noticed. I tend to be random about this name - washroom, restroom (most common prob), bathroom, ladies&apos; room....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627884</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MUD</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627888</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;nobody in the US understands &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot;....

I&apos;d actually love an explanation as to why this is considered to be a good thing. Because dog balls aren&apos;t something I&apos;ve considered getting all happy about.&lt;/i&gt;

Though there is no consensus on this, I&apos;d posit that it is purely down to the use of the definite article. Saying that something is &quot;a dog&apos;s bollocks&quot; is clearly not complimentary by any stretch of the imagination - dog&apos;s bollocks being two a penny these days. But to say that something is &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot; implies that while, yes we are still talking mutt&apos;s nuts, these are the very ne plus ultra of dog&apos;s danglers. And being compared to the apex of anything can be taken to be complimentary.

Similar reasoning could apply to why it&apos;s a good thing if you are &quot;the shit&quot;, but less so if you&apos;re simply &quot;a shit&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627888</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:00:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MUD</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627889</link>	
		<description>People here are calling the serious junctions that people use correctly &quot;roundabouts&quot;, and the little traffic calming things where 50% of people get the right of way wrong &quot;traffic circles&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627889</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:01:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pdxpogo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627908</link>	
		<description>&quot;Tere&apos;s me tum&apos; is my favorite way to mock the Irish aversion to haightches, Other than that most everything short of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang&quot;&gt;rhyming slang&lt;/a&gt; is understandable. Disclaimer I lived in Britain til six years old, use my fork in the left hand cut with my right. I often find myself spelling words with the gratuitous &quot;u&quot; I have no idea why at 59 I still adopt this affectation. I usually will correct the spelling but have been known to add the words to my personal dictionary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627908</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:11:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pdxpogo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Partario</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627915</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I actually think American wonky and British wonky are different, and it gets confusing. In the US we can say somebody is wonky if they&apos;re a policy wonk or data wonk - another version of geek, except more political.&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;ve never heard it used this way. In that particular instance I was referring to a copier which just never seems to work. Having now been a teacher in both the US and the UK I&apos;d say there&apos;s a lot more borrowing of slang among children. Like someone said above a lot of my US kids use &apos;brilliant&apos; and &apos;snog&apos; because of (probably) Harry Potter. Likewise I hear my UK kids using Americanisms like &apos;totally&apos;, &apos;wicked&apos;, and even &apos;elevator&apos;. I know a lot of them are huge fans of Adventure Time so I figure they must be picking it up from American tv.

On another note, I have friend who&apos;s a conspiracy nut and is always saying &apos;dodgy&apos;, and now it&apos;s creeping into my vocabulary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627915</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Partario</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627917</link>	
		<description>At a gas station in Oklahoma I was corrected: &quot;Oh, you mean the bathroom?&quot;

Some time later I looked it up and it&apos;s way more commonly used in Canada.

Also, probably in California because I fly over there often, &quot;Excuse me, where&apos;s the washroom?&quot; &quot;The restroom is over there&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627917</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:14:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Street</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627924</link>	
		<description>My family is of British descent, so maybe we always used some of the words in the main link. &quot;Autumn,&quot; for instance. (But that&apos;s probably more common in Canada and the US than the writer thinks.) And &quot;bloody&quot; was a swear word, not to be used in front of parents. Dad really didn&apos;t like that one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627924</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Street</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hoyland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627936</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;People here are calling the serious junctions that people use correctly &quot;roundabouts&quot;, and the little traffic calming things where 50% of people get the right of way wrong &quot;traffic circles&quot;.&lt;/em&gt;

Or, if you&apos;re in Minnesota, they get the right of way horribly wrong on the proper roundabouts, too. Wrong as in stopping on the roundabout.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627936</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hoyland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: briank</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627941</link>	
		<description>My current employer is a UK-based company, and the desktop teams on both sides share the same ticketing system, so I get to see all the help tickets from UK users.  One I saw yesterday tickled me no end:

&lt;i&gt;I know its a bit cheeky, but I wonder if its possible to swap the SyncMaster for a second P2210 if there are any available.&lt;/i&gt;

Just because I would *never* get a ticket like that in a million years.  More&apos;s the pity.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627941</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>briank</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madajb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627983</link>	
		<description>I grew up a British kid in the Northeast.
Many of the books I loved when I was a kid were English as were many of the TV shows we watched.
Listening to my father curse at a stuck bolt was a master&apos;s course in strange words and phrases.
To this day, the occasional &apos;u&apos; slips into my typing for no particular reason.

Unfortunately, with my accent, my father&apos;s eloquent  &apos;sodding thing&apos; just makes me sound like a git.

Similarly, if you&apos;re from Ohio and walking around saying &apos;bloody this&apos; and &apos;bloody that&apos;, you sound like a right wanker&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;, so stop.

Just stop.


&lt;sup&gt;*&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;small&gt; I was going to use another word that my relatives are fond of, but it&apos;s another word they get to use and Americans don&apos;t.&lt;small&gt; Of course, they pronounce it wrong, so what do they know.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627983</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:41:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madajb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: brundlefly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627989</link>	
		<description>I find myself saying things like bloody and cheeky more and more, but for the past +5 years I&apos;ve been dating a woman who was raised in London, so I may be an extreme example. I have a habit of picking up the verbal tics of people I spend a lot of time with.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627989</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:42:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4627994</link>	
		<description>Oh please, be married to a reformed Yorkshireman and before long the strangest fucking words will start coming out of your mouth.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4627994</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:44:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628007</link>	
		<description>Can&apos;t find a geographical distribution for this one, but here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diffen.com/difference/Restroom_vs_Washroom&quot;&gt;some discussion&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/8281/washroom-restroom-bathroom-lavatory-toilet-or-toilet-room&quot;&gt;washroom/bathroom etc.
&lt;/a&gt;
 I&apos;d really like to see it mapped in the US.

The only one that grates, for me, is &apos;toilet&apos;  - as in &quot;where is the toilet?&quot; as a way of getting directions to the bathroom. I understand it&apos;s just a perfectly normal word to use for the room itself and does not descend from a reference to the actual &lt;a href=&quot;http://define%20commode&quot;&gt;commode&lt;/a&gt;, but my grandmother&apos;s lace-curtain decency rebels: &lt;em&gt;ewwww, they just said toilet.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628007</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Street</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628012</link>	
		<description>Growing up around here it was always &quot;washroom&quot; in public and &quot;bathroom&quot; at home. Could be we picked up the habit of saying &quot;bathroom&quot; from TV.

My impression is that &quot;bloody&quot; used to be a very rude, low class thing to say. But during the  20th century it became less of a swear word and more of a casual way to express emphasis.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628012</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:50:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Street</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628022</link>	
		<description>I like calling things pants.

Cause pants are ridiculous. Sausage casings for your legs!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628022</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:53:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628033</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Americans don&apos;t say &quot;autumn&quot;? This feels like when I discovered &quot;washroom&quot; will get you funny looks in parts of the US, and you should say &quot;bathroom&quot; even if there&apos;s no bath, or &quot;restroom&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

There are some words here that may be used in Canada as well as Britain. I always heard autum when I was a kid in Canada, but I never used automn in writing because I can&apos;t spell. 

&quot;Washroom&quot; may not be uniquely Canadian, but it&apos;s not used the UK or in many parts of the US. They talk about that in an episode of &lt;i&gt;Northern Exposure&lt;/i&gt; when Shelley goes to visit friends in Canada and I had to learn to stop using it in Connecticut because it just confused most people. Many Canadians also use tap instead of faucet.

&lt;i&gt;The only one that grates, for me, is &apos;toilet&apos; - as in &quot;where is the toilet?&quot; as a way of getting directions to the bathroom. I understand it&apos;s just a perfectly normal word to use for the room itself and does not descend from a reference to the actual commode, but my grandmother&apos;s lace-curtain decency rebels: ewwww, they just said toilet.&lt;/i&gt;

and yet, ironically, &quot;toilet&quot; is itself a euphemism to refer to washing. The really rude thing would be to say &quot;Where can I urinate/shit?&quot;

I adjusted to toilet very quickly in Britain, though I tended to say &quot;loo&quot; more often as it sounded softer. My SO says loo-roll, but I still say toilet paper. (Why do North Ams have no problem with toilet-paper, but with toilet?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628033</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:56:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jontyjago</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628054</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The Britishism is more for equipment that&apos;s about to fail or doesn&apos;t work well.&lt;/em&gt;

To this Britisher wonky means something that&apos;s not straight or wobbly (I put a picture up but it&apos;s a bit wonky. Let&apos;s move, we&apos;ve got the wonky table.). I&apos;ve never come across it mean faulty equipment. That&apos;s more like shoddy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628054</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:04:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jontyjago</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: six-or-six-thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628055</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve wrapped myself up in so much British media and am surrounded by so many English (internet) friends that I sometimes forget if some of the words/phrases I use are &apos;okay&apos; in American English or not.  The word &apos;pants&apos; doesn&apos;t come naturally to me like it used to, for example.  They&apos;re trousers now.

Sorry if this apparently offends people.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628055</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:06:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>six-or-six-thirty</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stormpooper</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628072</link>	
		<description>cherrio, pip pip, nudge nudge, wink wink...now sod off.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628072</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:11:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stormpooper</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Whelk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628086</link>	
		<description>little bit of the ole lampshades in the submarine eh?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628086</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:15:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Whelk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628096</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I&apos;ve never come across it mean faulty equipment.&lt;/em&gt; 

I may have misunderstood the nuance, but I learned the British version on ships, where if something is wobbly or unstable it&apos;s definitely faulty anyhow.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628096</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:22:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628140</link>	
		<description>I just searched my work mail for &quot;wonky&quot;, and the first result was an American IT guy describing a faulty/misbehaving server.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628140</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: GenjiandProust</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628200</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It does sound funny to me (since I do only hear that usage from people in that area), but I was more puzzled because I thought the distinction being made was between the nouns &quot;queue&quot; and &quot;line&quot; (regardless of preposition) and couldn&apos;t figure out if &quot;on line&quot; was supposed to refer to the &quot;printer queue&quot; designation and now I&apos;ve confused myself again I think.&lt;/em&gt;

Sorry, I just thought it was funny that the queue/line example was from NY, which is the only place I have heard the in line/on line distinction. Of course, I guess in NYC you could be online on line in your in-lines, assuming wearing inline skates were still a thing.

Also, yes miko had it correctly; sorry for the confusion.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628200</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:12:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GenjiandProust</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Egg Shen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628204</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;little bit of the ole lampshades in the submarine eh?&lt;/em&gt;

That would put a spanner in the works.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628204</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:14:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Egg Shen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EmpressCallipygos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628212</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I like calling things pants.  Cause pants are ridiculous. Sausage casings for your legs!&lt;/em&gt;

That&apos;s not the kind of pants they&apos;re talking about, you know....

Although, I do think &quot;pants&quot; is one of those words that is just intrinsicly funny no matter what kind of garment is meant.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628212</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:17:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmpressCallipygos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Danf</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628239</link>	
		<description>In writing, I constantly use &quot;whilst&quot; rather than &quot;while.&quot;

So, yeah.   I, for one, will welcome and quarter my new Redcoat Overlords.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628239</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danf</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Wordshore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628254</link>	
		<description>Do any Americans use the (origin: Scotland) word &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/outwith&quot;&gt;outwith&lt;/a&gt;&quot; yet? Seems to be suddenly common in academia in England.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628254</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wordshore</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: benito.strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628293</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll tell you one phrase that hasn&apos;t come over: &quot;take the mickey&quot;. Because here&apos;s how the conversation went when I was working with a bunch of Brits at a British company&apos;s office in the US.

&quot;Don&apos;t worry. He&apos;s just takin&apos; the mick.&quot;
&quot;Taking the mick?&quot;
&quot;Taking the mickey.&quot;
&quot;Taking the mickey? What&apos;s that?&quot;
&quot;Ah, that&apos;s just the polite version of &apos;to take the piss&apos;.&quot;
&quot;&apos;Take the piss&apos;? What?&quot;
&quot;You know, to take the piss out of someone.&quot;

At which point my poor, confused brain, like Microsoft Word trying to open an MP3 file, did the best it could with what it had been given.  It conjured the image of opening someone&apos;s chest via some kind of kitchen cupboard door, revealing a shelf on which there was a small flask filled with yellowish urine, which was then literally &quot;taken out&quot; of the person. I didn&apos;t figure out the actual meaning until months later. 

I wonder what would have happened if I&apos;d have said &quot;You&apos;re pulling my leg, aren&apos;t you?&quot;. Do the British use that phrase, or would I have just given back as much confusion as I had received?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628293</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:43:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benito.strauss</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: symbioid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628332</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628212&quot;&gt;EmpressCallipygos&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;i&gt;&lt;em&gt;I like calling things pants.  Cause pants are ridiculous. Sausage casings for your legs!&lt;/em&gt;

That&apos;s not the kind of pants they&apos;re talking about, you know....&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

They&apos;re talking about foreskins, aren&apos;t they?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628332</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:02:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>symbioid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: benito.strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628334</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;/Oh, and apologies to any Irish folk who might have been offended by that exchange. I&apos;m not sure what the overtones of &quot;mick&quot; are when used that way.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628334</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:03:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benito.strauss</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jehan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628346</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh please, be married to a reformed Yorkshireman and before long the strangest fucking words will start coming out of your mouth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed, as much as some of the words in this article might muddle a few US minds, they&apos;re nothing compared to heavyweight dialect words. As a kid I took it for granted that everybody knew what &lt;em&gt;sprag&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;beal&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;boke&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;tush&lt;/em&gt; meant. Yet they&apos;re not even in most dictionaries.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The only one that grates, for me, is &apos;toilet&apos; - as in &quot;where is the toilet?&quot; as a way of getting directions to the bathroom. I understand it&apos;s just a perfectly normal word to use for the room itself and does not descend from a reference to the actual commode, but my grandmother&apos;s lace-curtain decency rebels: ewwww, they just said toilet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In England, &quot;toilet&quot; is polite. To be rude you have to ask for the &quot;bog&quot;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
/Oh, and apologies to any Irish folk who might have been offended by that exchange. I&apos;m not sure what the overtones of &quot;mick&quot; are when used that way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We call Irish jokes, &quot;thick Mick&quot; jokes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628346</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:06:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jehan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hoyland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628365</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;My impression is that &quot;bloody&quot; used to be a very rude, low class thing to say. But during the 20th century it became less of a swear word and more of a casual way to express emphasis.&lt;/em&gt;

I wouldn&apos;t say &apos;bloody&apos; in front of my mother and I do say &apos;fuck&apos; in front of my mother. I do say &apos;bloody&apos; in (US) public, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628365</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:13:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hoyland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hoyland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628374</link>	
		<description>That said, as far as my mother swearing goes, &apos;blood and sand&apos; is the phrase deployed in the most extreme circumstances and I have no idea what that&apos;s supposed to mean.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628374</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hoyland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jehan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628397</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That said, as far as my mother swearing goes, &apos;blood and sand&apos; is the phrase deployed in the most extreme circumstances and I have no idea what that&apos;s supposed to mean.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My grandfather says that it originated with downed planes in WW2. Folk coming to the scene of a bad crash with mangled wreckage soon learnt to exclaim, &quot;well, blood and sand!&quot; Why? Because that&apos;s all the relatives would get to bury...

I doubt this is true, but they supposedly did use dirt as makeweight for coffins if there wasn&apos;t enough left to bury.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628397</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:23:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jehan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: EmpressCallipygos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628409</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;They&apos;re talking about foreskins, aren&apos;t they?&lt;/em&gt;

Nope - the things you wear on the outside are &quot;trousers&quot;, and &quot;pants&quot; are you wear underneath your trousers.

Your foreskin is inside your pants and therefore your own business.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628409</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:32:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmpressCallipygos</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Queen of Spreadable Fats</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628411</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not able to do full research at the moment, but I think the origin &quot;the dog&apos;s bollocks&quot; might be connected to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/dogs-dinner.html&quot;&gt;the dog&apos;s dinner/breakfast&lt;/a&gt; expression, no?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628411</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queen of Spreadable Fats</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stevis23</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628427</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;A line is a one-dimensional entity. It is a topological impossibility for a three-dimensional entity to be &quot;in&quot; it.&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;m sorry, it&apos;s impossible to be &quot;on line&quot; unless you are splayed out on top of the people who are waiting.   These unfortunate people are &quot;in line.&quot;

I moved out east from Michigan; I&apos;ll relent to &quot;soda&quot; for &quot;pop&quot; but I am not surrendering this one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628427</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stevis23</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Deej</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628466</link>	
		<description>My youthful penchant for absorbing British media (in the form of Agatha Christie and Monty Python, particularly) came in handy when I visited Jamaica at 19 years old. A member of our group wanted to cash a check, and the local Port Antonio bank wouldn&apos;t take it without an account holder&apos;s co-signature.

On exiting the bank, we asked a random passerby if he could help, and through his thick Jamaican accent he explained that he did not have an account there, and that we needed a liar.

The check-holder protested that he would not want anyone to lie about it, and the man exclaimed louder and louder, that we needed to see a LIAR. After repeating &quot;LIAR&quot; about half a dozen times, and seeing our confusion, and with his frustration growing he finally said, &quot;No! Not a LIAR! A LYYY-ERRR!!! A barrister!!!&quot; 

The rest of the group has no clue what a barrister was, but I saw there was a lawyer&apos;s office across the street and thanked him. The LAWYER (not liar) was an account holder and gladly co-signed the check, as he knew who we were staying with.

Some of my co-travellers thought I must have been very worldly and intelligent to know the meaning of the word &quot;barrister&quot; so I just smiled smugly and didn&apos;t let on it was from watching Monty Python.

I&apos;m just glad he didn&apos;t say &quot;solicitor.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628466</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Deej</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: saysthis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628479</link>	
		<description>Canadianism I can&apos;t bring myself to use, but like: &quot;goof&quot;.  As in, wanker, twit, jackass.  Also, rude Canadianism I don&apos;t hear anyone but BC peckerwoods using, and which I&apos;ve made it my personal mission in life to popularize: &quot;fucky&quot;, which would be wonky, or as in the last example, goofy.  

Americanism British never seem to use: &quot;the can&quot;.  Americanism the British seem to have picked up waaaaaay too enthusiastically: the sarcastic &quot;really?&quot; as in, &quot;I totally can&apos;t believe you just said that.&quot;  Britishism Americans seem to have picked up on: &quot;bog-standard&quot;.  

Chinese official-speak I&apos;ve found creeping into my speech: &quot;relevant authorities&quot;, used in news articles and pronouncements as shorthand to indicate multiple or obscure (or to obfuscate) the people in charge of something.  Other useful Sinicisms: &quot;harmonize&quot; (censor), &quot;tall rich handsome/white rich pretty&quot; (used as gendered nouns, &quot;I&apos;m a tall rich handsome&quot;, in reference to romantic partners), &quot;firing squad&quot; (&#27609; as verb, to completely screw something up), &quot;-cunt&quot; (intensifier suffix like &quot;-ass&quot;, which you can append to ANYTHING-cunt), &quot;jiong/WTF&quot; (&#22247;, it looks like a face going &quot;WTF!&quot;, so it turned into internet slang as an adjective, &quot;Look at this jiong-cunt cute kitty!&quot;), and &quot;a bro&quot; (used to refer to myself in third person).  

I like innit, and I&apos;m keeping it.  I&apos;m a NAM, a Merkin (I say this, actually!), for anecdata.

In sum: language r fokken sweet, innit?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628479</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:12:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628597</link>	
		<description>We should just standardize (standardise?) on shitter.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628597</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:02:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: psoas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628653</link>	
		<description>I, American, had always pictured &quot;wonky&quot; has describing facial features that were sort of &quot;off&quot; and it just hit me that this mental picture is from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://amethyst-rainfall.tumblr.com/post/33628350966/roald-dahl-childhood-classic-3&quot;&gt;quote&lt;/a&gt; by noted British author Roald Dahl.

&lt;i&gt;I&apos;m a NAM, a Merkin (I say this, actually!), for anecdata.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkin&quot;&gt;Uh.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628653</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>psoas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mudpuppie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628734</link>	
		<description>The British guy I dated in college -- my first (and only) college boyfriend -- announced his interest in me be stating, &quot;You know, I&apos;m quite keen on you.&quot; I had no idea what he meant and went merrily on my way.

He had to try again using different words.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628734</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mudpuppie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mollymayhem</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628774</link>	
		<description>I have a dear British friend who I spend a lot of time with. I also absorb language styles VERY easily. I realized recently that &quot;cunt&quot; has slowly crept into my usage, and that it had better creep the hell back out again.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628774</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:37:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mollymayhem</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hap_hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4628833</link>	
		<description>Are y&apos;all having a laugh? Can&apos;t think I&apos;ve ever used that one, but I do like it.  A lot of these britishisms sound normal to me, but I&apos;m a magpie that way, if it says it better, I&apos;ll go ahead and use it. &apos;Dog&apos;s bollocks&apos; is wonderful, and I&apos;ll take it.

I&apos;ve always liked the various kinds of &apos;boys&apos; there are- &apos;wide boys&apos; is super-evocative to me. Hard boys is good, hey, &apos;let&apos;s hear it for the Soft Boys.&apos; I&apos;ve always wondered about &apos;bovver boys&apos;, let&apos;s see if the internet can enlighten me... yeah, it&apos;s about like I thought. But I imagine you have to sound cockney to actually pull it off. 

Not sure how many times I heard &apos;Seventeen&apos; by the Sex Pistols before I understood he was repeating &quot;I&apos;m a lazy sod,&quot; but I know it was years after that that I understood it was supposed to be dirty. I&apos;ll use it occasionally, but since that meaning of &apos;sod&apos; isn&apos;t current over here, it probably just makes me sound goofy. Oh wells.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4628833</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:07:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hap_hazard</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hap_hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629057</link>	
		<description>That said, if americans ever start saying &apos;drink driving&apos;, it&apos;s probably going to piss me off, because that just sounds dumb. Could also do without turning things into baby talk, i.e. &apos;telly&apos; or any of the creepy terms for food like &apos;buttie,&apos; whatever the hell that is.  But maybe that&apos;s just me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629057</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:05:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hap_hazard</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homunculus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629103</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I cannot remember a time when the word &quot;twit&quot; was not used.&lt;/i&gt;

Me neither.  I think &quot;fuckwit&quot; is a recent arrival, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629103</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:39:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: homunculus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629107</link>	
		<description>I guess &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/27022/Rude-words&quot;&gt;&quot;zuffle&quot;&lt;/a&gt; never really caught on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629107</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:41:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pyramid termite</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629112</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Canadianism I can&apos;t bring myself to use, but like: &quot;goof&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

i&apos;ve been hearing that one in michigan since the 60s

the worst canadianism in the world is &quot;eh?&quot; - it&apos;s been 30 years since i summered in canada and i&apos;m STILL saying it</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629112</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:45:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pyramid termite</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: PHINC</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629116</link>	
		<description>I use &apos;shit munchers&apos; because of Peep Show. But I heard it first from Bill Hicks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629116</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:48:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PHINC</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Flashman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629170</link>	
		<description>I can&apos;t stand this sort of affectation (the American students I&apos;d hear in the pub when I was living in Oxford would just drive me &lt;strong&gt;menn&lt;/strong&gt;(t)&lt;strong&gt;alll&lt;/strong&gt;) but I can&apos;t stand a lot of silly Britishisms either: &quot;not fit for purpose&quot;, &quot;gap year&quot;, &quot;have you got?&quot;, &quot;want to come with?&quot;. Worse is the habit, especially among the upper and aspiring upper classes to ascribe infantile nicknames to everything: biscuit becomes &apos;biccy&apos;; sandwich becomes &apos;sammy&apos;...
But the British love their Britishisms and they seem to come up with new ones every season and the old ones discarded. I don&apos;t think anybody&apos;s referred to a &apos;bovver boy&apos; [skinhead] in decades.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629170</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flashman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hoyland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629196</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m fairly bad at judging these things, but I&apos;m 99% sure &quot;want to come with?&quot; exists in some parts of the US. Google turns up the abstract some bloke&apos;s dissertation about its use in Minnesota.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629196</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:50:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hoyland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hap_hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629205</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I don&apos;t think anybody&apos;s referred to a &apos;bovver boy&apos; [skinhead] in decades.&lt;/i&gt;

:( 
 I probably got that from who knows where, Iain Sinclair? Martin Amis? Moore, Moorcock, something in The Invisibles? Something pulpier somehow than any of that? Maybe it was at least some period stuff. There does seem to be a current-ish band called that.. I was going to link to them but they&apos;re definitely skinheads, and I&apos;m not going to spend the time to parse whether they&apos;re the good kind or not. 

/end &apos;railly</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629205</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hap_hazard</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Eyebrows McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629225</link>	
		<description>&quot;but I&apos;m 99% sure &quot;want to come with?&quot; exists in some parts of the US.&quot;

It&apos;s a pretty standard midwestern usage.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/tribu/ct-tribu-words-work-midwest-20101208,0,2295075.story&quot;&gt; Chicago Tribune on it&lt;/a&gt;. I&apos;ve heard both Hilary Clinton and Michelle Obama use it, actually. :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629225</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:14:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eyebrows McGee</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jehan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629236</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Worse is the habit, especially among the upper and aspiring upper classes to ascribe infantile nicknames to everything: biscuit becomes &apos;biccy&apos;; sandwich becomes &apos;sammy&apos;...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Upper class say words like &lt;em&gt;biccy&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;telly&lt;/em&gt;? Never knew that. Shortening words with a &quot;-y&quot; or &quot;-ie&quot; ending is common among normal folk too. I&apos;ve not knowingly spoken to an upper class person, but I know plenty such words. For example:

&lt;em&gt;bevvy&lt;/em&gt;: drink, usually alcoholic
&lt;em&gt;biccy&lt;/em&gt;: biscuit
&lt;em&gt;croggy&lt;/em&gt;: passenger ride on a pushbike
&lt;em&gt;divvy&lt;/em&gt;: divide, dividend
&lt;em&gt;fotie&lt;/em&gt;: photograph
&lt;em&gt;leccy&lt;/em&gt;: electricity
&lt;em&gt;plaggy&lt;/em&gt;: plastic
&lt;em&gt;sarnie&lt;/em&gt;: sandwich
&lt;em&gt;telly&lt;/em&gt;: television</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629236</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jehan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: escabeche</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629375</link>	
		<description>&quot;Want to come with?&quot; is a Germanism/Yiddishism common in many parts of the US.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/166023/Why-do-some-people-end-sentences-in-with&quot;&gt;It has its own Ask thread&lt;/a&gt;.  I was startled to learn that there are Americans to whom it sounds strange.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629375</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:11:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>escabeche</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dunkadunc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629466</link>	
		<description>I was only in London a few whiffens past... Chip chip churree!!!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629466</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:48:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ripper Minnieton</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629506</link>	
		<description>What, no love for &apos;gutted,&apos; meaning extremely disappointed?  It&apos;s caught on incredibly quickly here since the 2000s, and it certainly catches that almost visceral sensation of hollowness that&apos;s caused by a really big let-down.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629506</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:38:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ripper Minnieton</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ActingTheGoat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629515</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;As someone from &quot;the tri-state area&quot; who also says &quot;on line&quot;, I must insist on the correctness of our usage.

A line is a one-dimensional entity. It is a topological impossibility for a three-dimensional entity to be &quot;in&quot; it.

Imagine you&apos;ve drawn a line on the floor and you want someone to stand over it. Are you going to stay &quot;stand in that line&quot;? Or are you going to say &quot;stand on that line&quot;?&lt;/em&gt;

Maybe it&apos;s that New Yorkers need to shoulder their way through the crowds, to push, to shove, to dominate, to stand ON line.

Californians are out in the sun, they might even be slightly more relaxed than the New Yorkers. They&apos;re IN the line, they&apos;re a part of the line, they are the line.

&lt;small&gt;I can&apos;t pretend to speak for points in between. I can&apos;t even pretend to speak for New York or California.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629515</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ActingTheGoat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dunkadunc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629557</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Maybe it&apos;s that New Yorkers need to shoulder their way through the crowds, to push, to shove, to dominate, to stand ON line.&lt;/em&gt;

New Yorkers, while they don&apos;t necessarily have a lot of patience for bullshit and are very good at moving through crowds, are generally pretty nice. That macho dominating elbowing crap is 100% Massachusetts.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629557</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:20:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Gringos Without Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629581</link>	
		<description>The people are the line.  You stand &quot;in&quot; line.  If you&apos;re &quot;on&quot; line you&apos;re standing on top of somebody.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629581</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:20:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gringos Without Borders</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Myeral</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629585</link>	
		<description>No mention of &apos;loo&apos; in the washroom/restroom/lavvy/bog/netty/WC debate?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629585</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Myeral</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tyllwin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4629659</link>	
		<description>My daughter picked up &quot;want to come with?&quot; from some time in the midwest, as so far as &quot;sammy/sammie&quot; for &quot;sandwich,&quot; my mind jumps to Rachel Ray (along with &quot;EVOO&quot; and &quot;delish&quot;). I just think it&apos;s funny that the Britishisms that sound annoying and affected to you are ones I&apos;d never have picked out as Britishisms at all.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4629659</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:07:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tyllwin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Lazlo Hollyfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4630361</link>	
		<description>I hear &quot;wonky&quot; a lot in tech contexts.  I&apos;m actually surprised it isn&apos;t in the jargon file.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4630361</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lazlo Hollyfeld</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4630793</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Shortening words with a &quot;-y&quot; or &quot;-ie&quot; ending is common among normal folk too.&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;Sammie&quot; has caught on in the US, but for that I blame Rachel Ray, not the UK.

I learned &quot;Brekkie&quot; (breakfast) from an Australian boss and now use it all the time.

&lt;em&gt;New Yorkers, while they don&apos;t necessarily have a lot of patience for bullshit and are very good at moving through crowds, are generally pretty nice. That macho dominating elbowing crap is 100% Massachusetts.&lt;/em&gt;

Having lived in both places, that&apos;s absolutely true. The idea that New Yorkers are rude is a total canard. They know how to behave in big crowds, something few people in other parts of America do. They have a pretty strong sense of justice that means they won&apos;t tolerate you cutting in front of them, but neither will they tolerate other people generally screwing up the system for others. Massachusetts people are shockingly inconsiderate of others; the idea is to treat everyone else as completely nonexistent (this is the real deal behind the famous &quot;reserve,&quot; and hope to get away with your pushiness. 

Living in the Boston area now, and whenever I travel back to the New York area, I breathe easier, especially using public transport: people sharing space are a thousand times more &lt;em&gt;civilized&lt;/em&gt; about it in New York City.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4630793</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: syncope</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4630959</link>	
		<description>re: pulling your leg

The more common expression would be &quot;the other&apos;s got bells on,&quot; as in &quot;pull the other leg, there&apos;re bells on it.&quot;

However I&apos;ve heard take the mickey many times used by Americans going back a long time. I think it&apos;s just old fashioned.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4630959</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:17:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>syncope</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: benito.strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4631042</link>	
		<description>Really? &quot;Take the mickey&quot; in America? Can I ask where and when, because I&apos;ve never heard it from anyone other that a Brit, Scot, Welsh, or Irish person.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4631042</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:11:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benito.strauss</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Atreides</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4631774</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve only heard &quot;slip him/her a mickey.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4631774</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 06:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atreides</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Miko</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4631781</link>	
		<description>Never heard &quot;take the mickey&quot; in the US.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4631781</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 06:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Pruitt-Igoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4632806</link>	
		<description>In Canada, a mickey is a 375 mL bottle of liquor shaped like a flask. It&apos;s not even really slang; for example you can ask the guy at the liquor store for a mickey of beefeater gin.

Only ever heard &quot;slip a mickey&quot; in US TV/movies, and I think that&apos;s probably being displaced by &quot;roofie&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4632806</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:01:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pruitt-Igoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grangousier</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4632861</link>	
		<description>Extracting the Michael.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4632861</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grangousier</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pupdog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4633059</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://static.grindtv.com/images/1/00/14/10/59/141059.jpg&quot;&gt;Mickey&apos;s?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4633059</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pupdog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: the man of twists and turns</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4634776</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/britishisms-in-america-americanisms-in-britain-suggested-swaps-across-the-pond?page=all&quot;&gt;Britishisms In America, Americanisms In Britain, Suggested Swaps Across The Pond&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;Dear England,

      The British press has had its knickers in a twist over Americans appropriating Britishisms for some time, whingeing about it in The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Beeb, and even that font of high British cultural observation, The Sun, which noted the phenomenon in its own colorful bespoke style.

          But it has now been officially recognized on this side of the...ocean (sorry, &apos;pond&apos; is just too trite)... in no less than The New York Times, in a wonderfully snarky piece by Alex Williams, who suggests that many Americans trying to sound hip and clever in fact are sounding too clever by half. The Britishization of English in America has also been officially recognized with its own website, Not One-Off Britishisms , the wonderfully entertaining work of English (the language, not the country) professor Ben Yagoda. A phenomenon sanctioned with its own website is sort of the Information Age equivalent of the OED officially sanctioning a word.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4634776</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:21:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the man of twists and turns</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: benito.strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4634798</link>	
		<description>&lt;cite&gt;A phenomenon sanctioned with its own website is sort of the Information Age equivalent of the OED officially sanctioning a word.&lt;/cite&gt;

With so much to read out here on the Internet, it&apos;s useful to know when to stop reading an article because it&apos;s clear the writer has no idea what&apos;s going on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4634798</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:50:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benito.strauss</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: six-or-six-thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120965/Wet-your-whistle-on-these#4635102</link>	
		<description>I honestly had no idea until this thread that things like wonky, sussed, whinge, one-off, roundabout, &apos;pop over&apos; and &apos;want to come with&apos; (I am midwestern though for what it&apos;s worth) were Britishisms.

And &apos;snarky&apos; is apparently a Britishism so CAST THE FIRST STONE METAFILTER I DARE YOU

Apparently by many&apos;s standards I am a poseur asshole.  :/

I dunno man look language evolves can&apos;t we just let it do its thing without being dicks about it I mean English itself is just stolen words and phrases</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.120965-4635102</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:03:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>six-or-six-thirty</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
