<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Lettering vs Calligraphy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Lettering vs Calligraphy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:10:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Lettering vs Calligraphy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy</link>	
		<description>Lettering vs Calligraphy: an epic battle you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.letteringvscalligraphy.com/&quot;&gt;decide&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lettering vs Calligraphy is a project by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resistenza.es/&quot;&gt;Giuseppe Salerno&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.martinaflor.com/&quot;&gt;Martina Flor&lt;/a&gt;. It consists of a visual dialogue between a letterer and a calligrapher,
where they draw/write a letter responding to a keyword given by a moderator. The adventure aims to explore the capabilities of the two technical approaches.
It delivers one letter daily and takes place online, where the visitors are invited to vote for their favourite.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sailormom</dc:creator>		<category>Lettering</category>		<category>Calligraphy</category>		<category>GiuseppeSalerno</category>		<category>MartinaFlor</category>		<category>battle</category>		<category>Graphicdesign</category>		<category>illustration</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Foci for Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730477</link>	
		<description>Wait, what is the difference between &lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/57941&quot;&gt;lettering&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/58120&quot;&gt;and&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://the-creative-spirit.blogspot.se/2008/10/what-is-difference-between-calligrapher_16.html&quot;&gt;calligraphy&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730477</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foci for Analysis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rahnefan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730524</link>	
		<description>Drawing versus writing, with a blurry line between, basically.

The lettered &quot;Roman L&quot; is getting a lot more votes than it ought...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730524</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:46:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahnefan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rahnefan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730541</link>	
		<description>Not to dis the lettered L - but the circles evoke DaVinci or D&#252;rer, but with a modern typeface for the numbers, whereas the written L just is what it is with almost no props (marbled background).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730541</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:52:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahnefan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730567</link>	
		<description>Are we supposed to simply pick the one we find most attractive? Or pick the one we feel is the best solution to the title above the examples?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730567</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730569</link>	
		<description>Heh. I think &quot;Letterer&quot; and I think Tom Frame, Todd Klein et al...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730569</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jacquilynne</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730617</link>	
		<description>I went and voted without knowing what the difference was between lettering and calligraphy, and first I thought it was one thing (font design vs. hand-executing fonts), and then I thought it was another thing (digital vs. ink), and then I thought it was a third thing (illustrated, gussied up letters vs just letters), and then I read Foci for Analysis&apos;s links and now I think maybe I&apos;m still wrong. But I might not be, either.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730617</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jacquilynne</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rahnefan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730620</link>	
		<description>Thorzdad I think they want the latter but I think most voters just went with the one they like most.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730620</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahnefan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rahnefan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730628</link>	
		<description>One big difference is that with most of lettering, revision is quick and easy; but with calligraphy, you either get it right the first time or you have to start over. Depending on the medium used for the lettering, which seems mostly digital here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730628</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rahnefan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: redsparkler</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4730805</link>	
		<description>I think it&apos;s unfair that they get to use different color backgrounds. One &quot;x&quot;, for example, should have the same color background as the other &quot;X.&quot;

 Adding color to the letter itself seems acceptable, but again, I think the basic elements should be the same in order to let the shape of the forms stand out.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4730805</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:13:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redsparkler</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: xicana63</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4731076</link>	
		<description>I am a big fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://jessicahische.is/&quot;&gt;Jessica Hische&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; lettering, but &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/search?q=chalk+hand+lettering&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=P0u&amp;tbo=d&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=nCrKUIO0Lcai2wXd_oGIAg&amp;ved=0CAcQ_AUoAA&amp;biw=1366&amp;bih=638&quot;&gt;chalk&lt;/a&gt; will always be the best medium for lettering hands down!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4731076</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xicana63</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: acetonic</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4731690</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m just getting a blank Wordpress template with &quot;Hello world&quot; This is not the debate I was looking for!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4731690</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acetonic</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Rashomon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/122843/Lettering-vs-Calligraphy#4731769</link>	
		<description>My mother was a calligrapher so I lean toward favoring that. But the high quality of calligraphy comes out better when words and sentences are presented as opposed to just one letter. The reason is because the relation of one letter to another is an important part of the design. 

I suppose you could say that about lettering too. Let&apos;s just say I like to see more than one letter.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2012:site.122843-4731769</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:03:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rashomon</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
