"Why We Won't Say Torture"
May 24, 2013 10:27 AM Subscribe
The NYT attempts to defend their standardization of official terms like enhanced interrogation, targeted strikes and indefinite detainees.
I posted this earlier and it was deleted because I called the activity by the NYT "cowardly." Which was seen as "editorializing."
So, please, don't delete this post as I now leave it up to the reader to decide if refusing to call something torture is good or not.
I posted this earlier and it was deleted because I called the activity by the NYT "cowardly." Which was seen as "editorializing."
So, please, don't delete this post as I now leave it up to the reader to decide if refusing to call something torture is good or not.
This post was deleted for the following reason: You are not really understanding the leave-yourself-out-of-posts thing that is important with posting to the front page. If you want to talk to the mods about site policy, write to us at the contact form or open a Metatalk thread, but do not do this. -- cortex
« Older Dog Years : Human Years exchange rate downgraded... | Like everything else, cocktail menus have grown... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments