<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 13140</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 13140</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:54:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 13140</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/23410.html"&gt;&quot;MS releases mother of all IE security patches&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Per the article:

&lt;i&gt;Microsoft has released a cumulative patch for Internet Explorer which the firm says is a &quot;critical&quot; security precaution against crackers which should be applied &quot;immediately&quot;. &lt;/i&gt;

Time to update/upgrade boys and girls.  :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:45:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crankydoodle</dc:creator>		<category>Microsoft</category>		<category>InternetExplorer</category>		<category>IE</category>		<category>security</category>		<category>patch</category>		<category>software</category>		<category>hackers</category>		<category>crackers</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#190953</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://a.wholelottanothing.org/archived.blah/12/01/2001/#748&quot;&gt;I noticed last night&lt;/a&gt; that it wasn&apos;t available on the windows update site for my windows XP install. If it is so critical and crucial that people get it, why isn&apos;t MS making it easier to get?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-190953</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:54:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bobo123</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#190976</link>	
		<description>these direct links from slashdot:

for IE6:&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.microsoft.com/download/IE60/secpac23/6/W98NT42KMeXP/EN-US/q313675.exe&quot;&gt;http://download.microsoft.com/download/IE60/secpac 23/6/W98NT42KMeXP/EN-US/q313675.exe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
for IE5.5:&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.microsoft.com/download/ie55sp2/secpac23/5.5_SP2/WIN98Me/EN-US/q313675.exe&quot;&gt;http://download.microsoft.com/download/ie55sp2/sec pac23/5.5_SP2/WIN98Me/EN-US/q313675.exe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-190976</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:46:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bobo123</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanFigaro</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#190978</link>	
		<description>Hmmm. . . the install file didn&apos;t recognize that I do, in fact, have IE6 installed.  Weird.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-190978</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UrbanFigaro</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: skallas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#190989</link>	
		<description>That&apos;s a start, now where&apos;s the mother of all IIS patches?  My firewall catches 50 IIS hack attempts a day from unpatched machines on AT&amp;amp;T&apos;s cable network.

MS should write it and ISPs should be mass mailing it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-190989</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:18:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Vetinari</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191030</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://httpd.apache.org/&quot;&gt;The mother of all IIS patches&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;font size=-1&gt;&amp;lt;/sarcasm&amp;gt; sorry, won&apos;t happen again.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191030</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:49:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vetinari</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DBAPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191033</link>	
		<description>Any bets that a fresh download of IE 6 download doesn&apos;t include these fixes?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191033</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:13:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DBAPaul</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DBAPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191034</link>	
		<description>Err, you know, ignore that second &quot;download&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191034</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:14:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DBAPaul</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanFigaro</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191036</link>	
		<description>You&apos;re right, DBAPaul.  I downloaded and reinstalled IE6 and it didn&apos;t have it.  Now that I&apos;ve reinstalled it, it has reasserted its Default Browser (SICH HEIL!!!) status.  Fear and disgust washed over me as all the little Netscape icons on my desktop suddenly appeared as little pastel e&apos;s.  Ugh.  Sadly, many websites (this one included) are best viewed with IE.  Damn the electric fence.  Damn the electric fence.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191036</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:35:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UrbanFigaro</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191037</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://corporate.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;Corporate Windowsupdate&lt;/a&gt;, either (where you can download patch files conveniently for redistribution, e.g. as on a network). Sometimes it takes a day or two for stuff to show up there. They have to write an additional system installation check for the ActiveX control.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191037</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:36:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jragon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191041</link>	
		<description>(chuckle)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191041</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:48:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jragon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: skallas</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13140/#191046</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s a two-week lag for something to get to the windowsupdate page according to microsoft.  Naww, I&apos;m not looking it up.  They may have changed their policy since I read that, but it seems about right.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.13140-191046</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 19:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
