Skip

The Spiders, Part 2.
January 1, 2002 6:51 AM   Subscribe

The Spiders, Part 2. Surely the greatest instant book of all time. cf. Part 1, and don't miss the "next..." link at the bottom of the first page. WOW.
posted by xowie (13 comments total)

 
Wow. This is amazing, moving, and well-written. I don't know what else to say. Thanks for the great link.
posted by pheideaux at 8:21 AM on January 1, 2002


cool, really.
posted by martz at 9:29 AM on January 1, 2002


This is quite good. I would gladly pay for a story of this quality.
posted by hadashi at 10:10 AM on January 1, 2002


Holy mole sauce. It's excellent. Nice post, zowie.
posted by Mo Nickels at 10:24 AM on January 1, 2002


Genius find! Thanks for sharing!
posted by dejah420 at 10:46 AM on January 1, 2002


For a minute there, I thought that this was Fritz Lang related.
posted by ed at 12:18 PM on January 1, 2002


I would gladly pay for a story of this quality.

So go ahead! :) Donation information for the site is here.
posted by webmutant at 12:46 PM on January 1, 2002


Good to see Farley doing interesting work. The first installment of the spider's series was something of a let down, but after finishing all three I realized the first part isn't really a part as much as it is just an intro into a much larger story.

Patrick's work is really good. Anyone know why he isn't in print? If the dreck I see at the indie section at Chicago Comics can sell I'm sure Pat's The Man I Almost Was compiled with Overheard at a Rave and his Thanksgiving special would sell like, err can't say hotcakes on Mefi, moonrocks at an astronaut convention.

I'm also very glad to see him put Apocoman on the back-burner. Its quite awful.
posted by skallas at 1:38 PM on January 1, 2002


The first part of Apocamon was great (c'mon, admit it, the Lion of Judah going "Snortle!" made you laugh). The second was very bad, though.
posted by kindall at 1:41 PM on January 1, 2002


That was a great ... fantasy. I didn't see a "part 3", though -- is that "Project" website supposed to be a 3rd part, or just a segment of part 2?
posted by dhartung at 2:38 PM on January 1, 2002


What I called part three was just the 'next' link on part two.
posted by skallas at 2:49 PM on January 1, 2002


Wow that's weird. Very cool, and a decent use of the medium. Thanks for supplying the link.

-Mars
posted by Mars Saxman at 1:35 AM on January 2, 2002


Been waiting for this installment for months--and now I'm anxiously awaiting the next. Superb!
posted by mooncrow at 9:00 AM on January 2, 2002


« Older   |   Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments



Post