<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 13739</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13739//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 13739</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:42:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 13739</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13739/</link>	
		<description>Who says DeCSS litigation is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnunet.com/News/1128198&quot;&gt;dead&lt;/a&gt;?  Norwegian court indicts the fellow who cracked DVD protection.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.13739</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:53:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donkeysuck</dc:creator>		<category>decss</category>		<category>litigation</category>		<category>dead</category>		<category>norway</category>		<category>dvd</category>		<category>hacker</category>		<category>copyprotection</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: yesster</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13739/#203914</link>	
		<description>Don&apos;t take indictment as necessarily pro-DMCA or pro-RIAA.  Indictment does not equal conviction.  An indictment followed by an acquittal would do more do damage the effectiveness of DMCA-like laws than no indictment at all.  Legal strategists know this, which is why, for example, some people intentionally try to get indicted for violation of sodomy laws, so that their acquittals will effectively kill those laws.

So without the indictment, the laws cannot be challenged.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.13739-203914</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yesster</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jfuller</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13739/#204108</link>	
		<description>&amp;gt; Who says DeCSS litigation is dead? 

Did anyone say DeCSS litigation was dead? Has the RIAA gone belly up? Has Hell frozen over?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.13739-204108</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:28:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
