<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 14203</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 14203</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 00:15:10 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 00:15:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 14203</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suck.com/daily/2000/06/20/daily.html&quot;&gt;Great article about the decline of obituary writing in American journalism&lt;/a&gt;.  Notable obits it names include Hunter Thompson&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/graffiti/cro.htm&quot;&gt;unflattering rendition of Nixon&lt;/a&gt; and H.L. Mencken&apos;s scathing posthumous indictment of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.albion.edu/history/tchambers/mencken.htm&quot;&gt;William Jennings Bryan&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should we go back to obits like these?  Damn right we should, says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suck.com&quot;&gt;suck.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2002 23:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yelling At Nothing</dc:creator>		<category>obituary</category>		<category>writing</category>		<category>obitwriting</category>		<category>history</category>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>suck</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Chanther</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#212981</link>	
		<description>The link to the Nixon obituary seems to be broken - it can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/graffiti/crook.htm&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-212981</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 00:15:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanther</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: waxpancake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#212987</link>	
		<description>Funny, I didn&apos;t think Suck said much of anything &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,27051,00.html&quot;&gt;anymore&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-212987</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 01:13:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waxpancake</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MrBaliHai</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213038</link>	
		<description>*sniff* I miss Suck. What other publication would ever have found common ground between Hunter S. Thompson and Tricky Dick?

Has obituary writing truly declined? I certainly can&apos;t ever recall a time when writing scathing, attack obits was the norm in journalism. I think that the pieces by Mencken and Thompson were aberrations, unfortunately.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213038</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 06:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MrBaliHai</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: alumshubby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213053</link>	
		<description>And glorious aberrations they were, too.  I think Mencken&apos;s obit of WJB was one of the most amazing feats of American writing I&apos;ve seen in quite a while.  If I were teaching AP American literature, I&apos;d try to inflict it on my students.  

Come to think of it, it would be a good reading assignment for AP American history, because high-school kids ought to know who Bryan was and the pivotal role he played in politics as America emerged from an agrarian nation into a modern urban one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213053</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 07:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alumshubby</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pjdoland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213059</link>	
		<description>Don&apos;t forget Ayn Rand&apos;s bizarre and venerating obituary for Marilyn Monroe, titled &quot;Through Your Most Grievous Fault&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213059</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pjdoland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rodii</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213070</link>	
		<description>That Bryan obit is the best evocation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/data/front.map.html&quot;&gt;red vs. blue&lt;/a&gt; I have yet seen.

&lt;small&gt;Couldn&apos;t find a better red-vs-blue map. Where have they all gone?&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213070</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rodii</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: raysmj</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213127</link>	
		<description>rodii: Except for what is, in effect, a reversal of the economic policy stances of both sides (and the vote was a lot closer in 2002 in the states than the red-blue map suggests, regardless). More &lt;a href=&quot;http://wwics.si.edu/OUTREACH/WQ/WQSELECT/BRYAN.HTM&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213127</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rodii</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213170</link>	
		<description>Ray, I&apos;m just talking about the cultural divide, not the parties.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213170</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:44:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rodii</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: raysmj</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213225</link>	
		<description>The economic stances is part of the cultural divide - or is tied in with it, and you&apos;d have to blind or Andrew Sullivan not to notice.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213225</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:55:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: raysmj</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14203/#213227</link>	
		<description>Or &quot;are&quot;  part of the divide, rather. This historical swapping of sides is something that I&apos;ve read about for eons and still haven&apos;t sorted out. But it&apos;s swept under the rug (as is the fact that Bryan had, oh, just a wee bit of help from progressive forces in the fight for Prohibition, as mentioned in an earlier thread).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14203-213227</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
