<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 14603</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 14603</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:18:09 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:18:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 14603</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.0format.com/daily/plinkfeb2002dennis.php#020802&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themorningnews.org/archive_updates/001619.html&quot;&gt;comes&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article/0,2997,s%253D1493%2526a%253D21865,00.asp&quot;&gt;backlash&lt;/a&gt;. Like a torrent of crap down Main St., Blogtown after a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101020211-198891,00.html&quot;&gt;heavy rain&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:59:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>		<category>media</category>		<category>blogging</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: moz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221645</link>	
		<description>i&apos;m sorry, t3, but why post a recap to the front page?  both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/1764&quot;&gt;dvorak&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/1762&quot;&gt;time&lt;/a&gt; articles have been posted, while the TMN article is original.  (why not also mention the &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/1772&quot;&gt;cs monitor&lt;/a&gt; article?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221645</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:18:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BentPenguin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221646</link>	
		<description>Hang on tight...Its tme for the great Blog shakeout of 2002.
When the music stops, every blogger try and grab a reason for existence (other than the ubiquitous &quot;look at me!&quot;).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221646</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TiggleTaggleTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221647</link>	
		<description>Sorry, maybe it wasn&apos;t a valid post but it just seems like there&apos;s a trend here...
Blogs flourish so now it becomes cool to hate blogs. Thought it might make for an interesting discussion as I know many MeFi members also maintain blogs of their own.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221647</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TiggleTaggleTiger</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: moz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221650</link>	
		<description>t3:

actually, i think the articles you cite (besides the TMN mini-op/ed) are positive of weblogging.  the negativity hasn&apos;t quite hit the journalist community in significant degree, though it probably will at some point.  i mentioned at the TMN forum as well that i think many weblogs shouldn&apos;t be judged so harshly for they really aren&apos;t intended to be well-written pieces of art (as opposed to trying and failing).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221650</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jjg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221678</link>	
		<description>Funny, I thought the backlash happened three years ago.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221678</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:58:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: me3dia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221679</link>	
		<description>Another point to be made is that the majority of bloggers make no effort to reach a wide audience. They exist for the pleasure of the author(s) and their friends&apos;n&apos;family, and their content reflects that.

I have a blog, and I&apos;ve made efforts to make it &quot;public&quot; (I&apos;ve even taken out TextAds), but the vast majority of bloggers will never take that leap. There&apos;s no point holding them up to scrutiny for making spelling mistakes.

Sure, we might see a shake-out, but what I think is more likely is a further differentiation between these &quot;public&quot; and &quot;private&quot; blogs.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221679</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 10:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>me3dia</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jga</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221747</link>	
		<description>Yes, this backlash hit years ago, but I&apos;m wondering if this is the second-generation of backlash. The weblog phenomenon started when a) the tools arrived to make the backend process easy, and b) a format was established that made coming up with content easy (annotated links and diary entries). So a lot of people got on board. But now a couple of years have gone by and recently I&apos;ve been seeing a lot of posts from bloggers who are getting bored of the format and don&apos;t want to do the default thing anymore but instead try for something more ambitious or maybe just truer to themselves. That&apos;s why I think this round of backlash isn&apos;t focused so much on weblogs themselves but the quality of the content.

Anyway, speaking of backlash, here&apos;s another recent find: &lt;a href=&quot;http://listed.pitas.com/&quot;&gt;The List&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221747</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:19:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jga</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: moz</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221753</link>	
		<description>wow, all the a-list noise you could ever want repackaged and sold for no profit.  thanks, jga.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221753</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:27:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh2d2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221760</link>	
		<description>Figures, just as I get around to doing a blog, they go out of style... someone give me another project, please!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221760</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:37:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh2d2</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: meep</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221798</link>	
		<description>What does that PCmag guy have against pages of cat pics?!  More kitty porn!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221798</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:18:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meep</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: megnut</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221821</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t mind weblog criticism, but couldn&apos;t we get some new complaints? Reading the same ones time and time again is boring.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221821</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:38:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>megnut</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jga</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#221866</link>	
		<description>0format adds a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.0format.com/daily/plinkfeb2002dennis.php#020802&quot;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; to the previous comment. It&apos;s a global village we live in, isn&apos;t it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-221866</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jga</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: davidmsc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14603/#222126</link>	
		<description>...but MY blog is *different* than everyone else&apos;s...I swear...and my purpose for maintaining a blog is much more profound than everyone else&apos;s.  Really.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.14603-222126</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 20:54:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidmsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
