I heard somebody say this nuclear waste should be scattered all over enviromentally sensitive areas. Although the occasional lizard or monkey might get irradiated, human encroachment, be it 4-wheelers, loggers, or even eco-tourists-could then be curtailed. Who's gonna cut down a tree or go hiking at the expense of 20,000 chest X-rays every 2 seconds? Seems like a good idea to me. posted by quercus at 10:02 AM on February 8, 2002
I heard somebody say this nuclear waste should be scattered all over enviromentally sensitive areas. Although the occasional lizard or monkey might get irradiated, human encroachment, be it 4-wheelers, loggers, or even eco-tourists-could then be curtailed. Who's gonna cut down a tree or go hiking at the expense of 20,000 chest X-rays every 2 seconds? Seems like a good idea to me. posted by quercus at 10:03 AM on February 8, 2002
Thanks for the links, dcehr. I think this is the first time I have seen the HCN website. It seems like a pretty good resource, and something I should be reading, as a westerner. As for Yucca Mountain, how long has this process taken, a couple decades? Sometimes I wonder how many nuclear power plants we would have in this country if every state that used nuclear power had to keep the waste in its own land. I can see why Nevada's governor said, "This decision stinks and Nevada will redouble its fight." I thought that the decision to cut off the water to Yucca Mountain to be an interesting move. posted by eckeric at 3:35 PM on February 8, 2002
« Older
Here comes the backlash. Like a torrent of crap do...
| Eat a candy bar - go to Jail....
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by quercus at 10:02 AM on February 8, 2002