<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Seventeen Magazine made me look superficial</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Seventeen Magazine made me look superficial</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:50:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:50:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Seventeen Magazine made me look superficial</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonsquarenews.com/getstory.php?id=20002529"&gt;Seventeen Magazine made me look superficial&lt;/a&gt; Do female teen magazines provide a crass commercial role model for young women? Who says that Mefi doesn&apos;t try to get in touch with its feminine side. (found from obscurestore.com)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AsiaInsider</dc:creator>		<category>seventeenmagazine</category>		<category>teens</category>		<category>females</category>		<category>sexist</category>		<category>superficial</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: machaus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231500</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d tend to say that Seventeen hasn&apos;t kept pace with the advancing sophistication (or at least the vanishing idyllic glee of childhood) of today&apos;s teen women.  They appear to still be trapped in the eighties.  I think it&apos;s a bad editor in chief rather than a master plan to subjugate teens with mindless mall rat drivel.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231500</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:50:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: clavdivs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231501</link>	
		<description>my fav qoute.&quot;I stopped reading at 15&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231501</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clavdivs</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bingo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231505</link>	
		<description>I always thought that girls looked superficial just by carrying around a copy of Seventeen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231505</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bingo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Voyageman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231513</link>	
		<description>Seventeen targets the &quot;aspirational&quot; demographic : those 11-14 year olds who want to be 17.  As they turn 15 they want to be 21,  turn 21, want to be 30, turn 30, want to be 40, turn 40 and want to be 17 again. 

While we are on the general teen girl topic -  todays NY Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/magazine/24GIRLS.html&quot;&gt;cover story &lt;/a&gt;is a must read (reg req)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231513</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:29:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: malphigian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231515</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&apos;d tend to say that Seventeen hasn&apos;t kept pace ...&lt;/i&gt;

Seventeen IS a magazine for 13 year olds, or (brace yourselves for incoming marketingspeak horror) &quot;the tween market&quot;.  Seventeen is completely on top of their demographic, and they know quite well thats its young teens and pre-teens, heavy crossover (at least a year ago) with boy-band and britney fans.

(I had the misfortune of reading a lot of relevant market research on this last year).

Sucks for this NYU student, but if seventeen spent time promoting an image of well rounded, healthy, intelligent women, they&apos;d lose their market share as fast as Maxim would if it did the same.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231515</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:32:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>malphigian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: AsiaInsider</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231520</link>	
		<description>It gets even scarier than the NY Times story &lt;a target=&apos;_self&apos; href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55070-2002Feb22.html&quot;&gt;alphagirls and power &lt;/a&gt;

its tough being a kid these days.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231520</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AsiaInsider</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: victors</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231522</link>	
		<description>we aren&apos;t seriously supposed to feel &lt;i&gt;sorry&lt;/i&gt; for this Hessel woman, are we?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231522</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:55:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>victors</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: RavinDave</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231541</link>	
		<description>Is it just my imagination, or does virtually *every* magazine aimed toward a female audience have an &quot;astrology&quot; column?  What&apos;s that say about us?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231541</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:41:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RavinDave</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231549</link>	
		<description>well i dunno, RavinDave. what&apos;s your sign?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231549</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fujikosmurf</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#231659</link>	
		<description>Superficial? It&apos;s &lt;i&gt;Seventeen&lt;/i&gt;! What did she expect?

The NYTimes article is right on target, though. I&apos;ve seen few things more backhandedly cruel than teenage girls.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-231659</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:56:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fujikosmurf</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mcgraw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#232351</link>	
		<description>Voyageman, thanks for the link.  I think it&apos;s worth reposting that NYTimes to the Mefi main page.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-232351</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:31:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mcgraw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bittennails</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15047/Seventeen-Magazine-made-me-look-superficial#232389</link>	
		<description>Well, there is a counterpart in the masculine world...Alpha Males...lest we forget.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.15047-232389</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:10:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bittennails</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
