Somehow I find this depressing. posted by bingo at 6:05 AM on February 27, 2002
Depressing when you stop and think that the model from my year (1967) is at least 52. posted by Dean_Paxton at 6:12 AM on February 27, 2002
It would be much more telling to show the model today at her current age. posted by mecran01 at 6:27 AM on February 27, 2002
I'm suddenly in the middle of the Free Porn episode of 'Friends'... posted by feelinglistless at 7:45 AM on February 27, 2002
I hear you Dean. I am '67 as well. She was a hottie for sure, but what she must look like now...... posted by a3matrix at 7:46 AM on February 27, 2002
A3matrix: If you're 67 you should be glad to get your dying hands on a young fiftysomething filly like her. posted by MiguelCardoso at 8:21 AM on February 27, 2002
He meant "born in '67."
Enjoy this site while it lasts, Playboy's hawk lawyers will be all over it by March, I'm sure. posted by Fofer at 8:34 AM on February 27, 2002
She's been dead since 1929
How I cried that night
If only I'd been born in Lily's time
It would have been all right posted by Kafkaesque at 9:25 AM on February 27, 2002
anyone want some free php?
the sites a bite buggered at the mo !!! posted by monkeyJuice at 12:49 PM on February 27, 2002
eventual nudity
Were that more things in our world required this disclaimer. posted by Shadowkeeper at 1:59 PM on February 27, 2002
Or the opposite disclaimer: no eventual nudity. posted by bingo at 3:27 PM on February 27, 2002
Wow, shouldn't someone born in August 1993 not be able to see the playmate? posted by alex3005 at 4:06 PM on February 27, 2002
« Older Unemployed people are supposed to be actively look... | Alzheimer's gene screened out ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Wah!
posted by jpburns at 5:53 AM on February 27, 2002