Comments on: Comments on 15129

Post number 15129

johnnydark — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:43:53 -0800

Virgo? Leo? Virgo-Leo cusp? Who cares! All that really matters is your Birth Playmate! (eventual nudity)

jpburns — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:53:35 -0800

Gee... But I was born in 1959! Wah!

bingo — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:05:14 -0800

Somehow I find this depressing.

Dean_Paxton — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:12:07 -0800

Depressing when you stop and think that the model from my year (1967) is at least 52.

mecran01 — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:27:49 -0800

It would be much more telling to show the model today at her current age.

feelinglistless — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:45:02 -0800

I'm suddenly in the middle of the Free Porn episode of 'Friends'...

a3matrix — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:46:14 -0800

I hear you Dean. I am '67 as well. She was a hottie for sure, but what she must look like now......

MiguelCardoso — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:21:41 -0800

A3matrix: If you're 67 you should be glad to get your dying hands on a young fiftysomething filly like her.

Fofer — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:34:03 -0800

He meant "born in '67." Enjoy this site while it lasts, Playboy's hawk lawyers will be all over it by March, I'm sure.

Kafkaesque — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:25:50 -0800

She's been dead since 1929 How I cried that night If only I'd been born in Lily's time It would have been all right

monkeyJuice — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:49:01 -0800

anyone want some free php? the sites a bite buggered at the mo !!!

Shadowkeeper — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:59:17 -0800

eventual nudity Were that more things in our world required this disclaimer.

bingo — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:27:40 -0800

Or the opposite disclaimer: no eventual nudity.

alex3005 — Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:06:43 -0800

Wow, shouldn't someone born in August 1993 not be able to see the playmate?