You Can't Trust What You Read About Nutrition
January 7, 2016 1:00 PM Subscribe
You Can't Trust What You Read About Nutrition "In a 2013 analysis published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Ioannidis and a colleague selected 50 common ingredients at random from a cookbook and looked for studies evaluating each food’s association to cancer risk. It turned out that studies had found a link between 80 percent of the ingredients — including salt, eggs, butter, lemon, bread and carrots — and cancer."
My concern about posting this is that it will be read as a reaction against science as a whole, or good nutritional science. That is not my intent.
My concern about posting this is that it will be read as a reaction against science as a whole, or good nutritional science. That is not my intent.
This post was deleted for the following reason: Hey if you want some help reframing, let us know, but the metacommentary about your own framing makes this a bit weird from the jump. -- LobsterMitten
« Older Celebrating the Polyester Decade | “The best pairing American cuisine has to offer” Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments