Searle argues that, without "understanding" (or "intentionality"), we cannot describe what the machine is doing as "thinking" and, since it does not think, it does not have a "mind" in anything like the normal sense of the word. Therefore, he concludes that "strong AI" is false.
« Older Who gets what degree where? | The GIGABORE: A decade of cultural blandness Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments