<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 16719</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 16719</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:24:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 16719</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3/static/RTF/en/5360.htm"&gt;Of the 9 Windows XP updates I needed, this was one of them.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;ve updated once before.  And mind you, nor do I use my XP partition, but to grab photos off my camera and the rare must-see Quicktime experience.  This is what an &quot;update&quot; entails in Microsoft territory apparently.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:02:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>		<category>computers</category>		<category>dvds</category>		<category>disney</category>		<category>windowsxp</category>		<category>updates</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: iconomy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267313</link>	
		<description>I kept waiting for the joke to become apparent until I realized that it wasn&apos;t a joke, which makes it even funnier than if it had been.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267313</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: banished</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267314</link>	
		<description>It isn&apos;t a joke??? :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267314</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>banished</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crasspastor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267317</link>	
		<description>Let&apos;s see.  If this if this page isn&apos;t yanked or changed in the process of the day.  I&apos;ve got an image.  Mirror?  Better yet, take your own screenshots and mirror them yourselves.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267317</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:43:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nedrichards</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267318</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s actually a serious problem (and not just for that movie). I remember a mordantly witty headline in The Register about it a while back. it&apos;s to do with using Rich Media in the DVD menu&apos;s or somesuch. You can imagine how long it took to get fixed as soon as bill took home his Disney DVD collection...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267318</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nedrichards</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nedrichards</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267319</link>	
		<description>here&apos;s the article in full: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22472.html&quot;&gt;Anyway, the question is: which dwarf is Disney most like in its total failure to realise that people may want to use the DVD in a machine running Windows XP? Doc, Happy, Bashful, Sneezy, Sleepy, Grumpy or Dopey?&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

It&apos;s really Disney&apos;s problem BTW.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267319</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nedrichards</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crasspastor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267320</link>	
		<description>How exciting it was to feel as though I&apos;d let the cat out of the bag.  Momentarily.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267320</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:56:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: SpecialK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267360</link>	
		<description>I wonder what&apos;s in this update that they aren&apos;t telling you about?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267360</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:25:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SpecialK</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mmascolino</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267384</link>	
		<description>If you want funny Microsoft Knowledge base articles, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q172653&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267384</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:19:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmascolino</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267393</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s been up on the windows update site for almost a month. What?

Looks like a legit software fix to me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267393</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nomisxid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267436</link>	
		<description>There is a small group of about 10 dedicated coders at microsoft, who are called &quot;the app compatability group&quot;, it is their job to find places where someone has written an application that incorrectly calls the windows-API, causing a crash.  If the faulty-product is popular enough, they rewrite the OS so that that particular app, in that particular instance, won&apos;t crash anymore.  A very difficult job, given that they are working from the assembly of some third party software, generally.  Apperantly a Disney movie is considered popular enough to make the bar for a fix...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267436</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:38:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nomisxid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mattpfeff</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16719/#267501</link>	
		<description>The thing is, to a PC user who doesn&apos;t really know anything about how these dang things work (and that is almost all of them, the collective wisdom of MeFi users notwithstanding), this update is about as important as any other. He/she wouldn&apos;t know what to do if he tried to play the DVD and it didn&apos;t work; it would just be another mysterious quirk in the box. 

Not that you can count on those users to update their OS, but, hey, you can&apos;t have everything....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16719-267501</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:07:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
