<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 16935</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 16935</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 11:59:53 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 11:59:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 16935</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.laexaminer.com/mt/archives/week_2002_05_05.html#001552"&gt;Star Trek&apos;s George Takei scoops LA Times by two months.&lt;/a&gt; Los Angeles is so big that The Valley wants to secede as does Hollywood. 
Takei, who grew up in LA, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgetakei.com/news-2002-march.asp&quot;&gt;pointed out &lt;/a&gt;in his web site months ago that if Hollywood split away, the world famous sign, which isn&apos;t technically in Hollywood would be on LA real estate. 
Not until today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laexaminer.com/&quot;&gt;LAEXAMINER.com &lt;/a&gt;reported, did the LA Times seem to think this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-050602holly.story&quot;&gt;newsworthy&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 11:47:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tsarfan</dc:creator>		<category>georgetakei</category>		<category>star</category>		<category>trek</category>		<category>hollywood</category>		<category>secede</category>		<category>latimes</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: inpHilltr8r</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271843</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/film/newsid_1921000/1921872.stm&quot;&gt;The BBC had this a month ago.&lt;/a&gt;

Damn, I get better local news from the world service than I do from the local media.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271843</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 11:59:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>inpHilltr8r</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZachsMind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271875</link>	
		<description>George Takei has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgetakei.com&quot;&gt;his own website&lt;/a&gt;? Wow! Cool!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271875</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 13:07:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271887</link>	
		<description>It should be noted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.napalc.org/events/courage_rec.html&quot;&gt;Takei has been politically active for years&lt;/a&gt;, both in Asian-American and local civic circles, including holding appointed office. Just in case you thought this was out of the blue.

All power to Welch &amp;amp; Co. at the Examiner, who have been pointing out the gaps in the Times&apos;s local coverage for a while now, but I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s &lt;i&gt;earthshaking&lt;/i&gt; that a neighborhood civic booster figured this out before they did!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271887</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 13:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: RakDaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271902</link>	
		<description>No, but it goes to show the continuing suckage that is the LAT.  I hope Dick Riordan&apos;s new paper will be as good as the Examiner boys keep saying it will.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271902</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 13:55:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RakDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wackybrit</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271910</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t get all this nonsense about &apos;secession&apos;. Unless Holly wood is going to put itself onto a truck and drive 20 miles further away from LA (a la Springfield) it&apos;ll still be a suburb of LA. It&apos;s about as stupid as Brooklyn splitting from New York City. Oh well, I don&apos;t pretend to understand these issues. If I did, I&apos;d be out helping the Israelis and Palestinians.

One way of solving this is to just change the sign to say &apos;LOS ANGELES&apos; ;-) I make such a great diplomat.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271910</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 14:06:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wackybrit</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: PeteyStock</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16935/#271939</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&apos;t get all this nonsense about &apos;secession&apos;&lt;/i&gt;

The main issue, of course, is the belief that LA is just getting too big and ponderous for it&apos;s own good.  Aside from Hollywood, there are other parts of LA that are looking to secede; a couple of relevant articles (for starters) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/articles.asp?ID=1184&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://sundial.csun.edu/sun/02s/022602op1.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Yeah, it&apos;ll still be a &apos;burb of LA, but really it comes down to having better control of their own fate.

&lt;i&gt;It&apos;s about as stupid as Brooklyn splitting from New York City&lt;/i&gt;

Well, probably now it is, but when NYC was consolidated 100 years ago, there was a LOT of opposition.  At that time, Brooklyn itself was, I think, one of the five-largest cities in the US.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.16935-271939</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 15:05:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PeteyStock</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
