Comments on: Comments on 17432

Post number 17432

Su — Mon, 27 May 2002 12:01:48 -0800

Guimp.com claims to be the world's smallest web site. And it probably is.
Jakob must be spinning in his crypt.
You don't have to scroll, though.

By: Marquis

Marquis — Mon, 27 May 2002 12:09:07 -0800

Hee hee. So small! I like the Google searchbox.

By: ashbury

ashbury — Mon, 27 May 2002 12:19:30 -0800

Darn! I missed the searchbox. I did play the world's smallest game of pong, tho. Vewy cute.

By: jonpollard

jonpollard — Mon, 27 May 2002 12:58:11 -0800

The world's smallest game of Space Invaders is perhaps a little *too* small, but I love the rest of it.

By: davidmsc

davidmsc — Mon, 27 May 2002 13:02:51 -0800

Why? WHY? Is this part of the project to see if ants can design tiny websites in space...? What does it meeeeaaaaannnnn?!?!

By: Mossy

Mossy — Mon, 27 May 2002 13:08:29 -0800

I got 27 in the space invaders. Then my eyeballs exploded from playing on a hi res 19 inch monitor. Ack. Not advised..

By: HTuttle

HTuttle — Mon, 27 May 2002 13:31:28 -0800

Finally, a use for the Windows Magnifier accessory. And is this one of the biggest?

By: fnord_prefect

fnord_prefect — Mon, 27 May 2002 15:41:55 -0800

Doh! Tried playing Pong... And my monitor is at 1280x1024. Ow ow ow ow ow.

By: schlaager

schlaager — Mon, 27 May 2002 19:20:58 -0800

I had to scroll. I have the world's smallest monitor :)

By: iconomy

iconomy — Mon, 27 May 2002 20:21:50 -0800

I can't do the maze - I keep getting disoriented. But I did win money in the teeny tiny slot machine. The html version has pics of famous people - I recognize Jim Morrison and Elvis (I think) but not the others. Totally adorable site.

By: tweebiscuit

tweebiscuit — Mon, 27 May 2002 21:37:22 -0800

Amazing stuff. Almost reminds me of when high-concept conceptual artists design websites and end up looking like fools: "We create a site that fits the most information into the smallest space in order to draw a contrast between screen space and information space and blah blah blah and famous images still identifiable blah blah blah boring boring suck." Except it was totally better. (I did, by the way, find the Google box and the still-recognizable famous images the most interesting.)

By: Frasermoo

Frasermoo — Tue, 28 May 2002 01:55:41 -0800

excellent, but my eyeballs, god, my eyeballs.....

By: i_cola

i_cola — Tue, 28 May 2002 04:40:32 -0800

1600 x 1200...totally useless!! Clicking thru to the 'London Design Collective' homepage I have to say that it is so refreshing to see a young British design co. using tightly tracked Helvetica Heavy for their logo...

By: dong_resin

dong_resin — Tue, 28 May 2002 07:27:48 -0800

Genius! My new favorite site.

By: Su

Su — Tue, 28 May 2002 07:47:20 -0800

...and if that isn't a recommendation, I don't know what is.

By: Su

Su — Tue, 28 May 2002 07:49:00 -0800

Hrm. Just realized. I wonder what would happen if you viewed the place through Mark Daggett's Icon Browser. Gotta try that out later.

By: Modem Ovary

Modem Ovary — Tue, 28 May 2002 09:35:34 -0800

Kick. Ass.

By: epersonae

epersonae — Thu, 30 May 2002 11:57:43 -0800

for the html & flash, kicking the magification up to 900% in Opera really helps. :)