<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 18180</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 18180</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:07:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:07:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 18180</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/</link>	
		<description>The President &quot;has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/opinion/02KRUG.html&quot;&gt;more familiarity&lt;/a&gt; with troubled energy companies and accounting irregularities than probably any previous chief executive.&quot;  (NYTimes link, reg req&apos;d)
Krugman chimes in on Whitehouse outrage to corporate fraud. 
(See also, Cheney&apos;s investigation regarding Halliburton&apos;s accounting while he was it&apos;s big cheese)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 07:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>krugman</category>		<category>bush</category>		<category>enron</category>		<category>halliburton</category>		<category>cheney</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mblandi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#298919</link>	
		<description>smackdown</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-298919</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:07:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mblandi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dejah420</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#298941</link>	
		<description>*gasp*  You mean Bush and Cheney aren&apos;t honest, upright businessmen?  Surely you jest. 

[/snark]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-298941</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:33:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nofundy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#298971</link>	
		<description>Go Krugman! 
A little light in a dark world and I thank you.  
What say you defenders of all things Dubya and Publican?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-298971</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 09:05:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dirjy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299003</link>	
		<description>Surely if Whitewater was worth investigating fully, then so is this?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299003</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 09:46:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirjy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: revbrian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299053</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What say you defenders of all things Dubya and Publican?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Krugman&lt;/b&gt; writing in the &lt;b&gt;NY Times&lt;/b&gt;! What else is there to say about it? 

I do find it interesting that it&apos;s this administration&apos;s SEC that is prosecuting the misdeeds that occured (mostly) during the previous one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299053</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:41:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: revbrian</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299056</link>	
		<description>Oh yeah. It&apos;s appearantly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townhall.com/columnists/jackkemp/jk20020702.shtml&quot;&gt;Clinton&apos;s Fault&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299056</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: BentPenguin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299060</link>	
		<description>Blaming Clinton has always been the Right&apos;s way of diverting attention from  the ugly facts they&apos;re desperate to avoid.

The truth is, the whole gov&apos;t --both parties, are so wrapped up in their own bullshit, that the net effect is that Washington is asleep at the wheel. At this rate, one of these blonders is gonna really cost the country.  Some might argue that this is what has just taken place in the last year or so.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299060</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:54:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299114</link>	
		<description>Krugman for Secretary of the Treasury
(only President Wellstone could possibly name him, but, you know...)


&lt;b&gt;. It&apos;s appearantly Clinton&apos;s Fault.&lt;/b&gt;
Of course it is. Right after murdering Vince Foster who had an affair with his wife, Clinton sneaked into Enron, Xerox, AND Vivendi headquarters and cooked their books
(he also ate all their candy)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299114</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 11:48:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299314</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15500-2002Jul2.html&quot;&gt;Bush responds.&lt;/a&gt; (note the snappish tone.)

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Everything I do is fully disclosed; it&apos;s been fully vetted,&quot; the president said as he paused to speak with reporters during a church appearance in Wisconsin. &quot;Any other questions?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Clinton&apos;s mistake was not following up &lt;i&gt;&quot;I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky,&quot;&lt;/i&gt; with &lt;i&gt;&quot;Any other questions?&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Brilliant move, that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299314</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:59:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: holycola</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299367</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I do find it interesting that it&apos;s this administration&apos;s SEC that is prosecuting the misdeeds that occured (mostly) during the previous one.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you saying that Clinton&apos;s administration should have been &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; regulatory? More untrusting of the wisdom of the market and the rational truths of the sacred MBA? More like a Democrat, and less like, say, a Republican [smiles - I&apos;m just ribbing ya, sorta]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299367</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holycola</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: holycola</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299368</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(he also ate all their candy)&lt;/i&gt;

But he did leave some tasteful, freshly cobbled loafers behind in exchange.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299368</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:21:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holycola</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rhyax</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18180/#299397</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Krugman writing in the NY Times! What else is there to say about it?&lt;/i&gt;

sigh. this is what depresses me about so many republicans. a total and complete disregard for logic, thought, and substantive discussion. i, of course, don&apos;t mean all republicans, some have thought out their views and can argue them, but so many seem either unable or completely unwilling. all of our debate seems one sided, it&apos;s as if the republican administration has decided they have no desire or need to justify their decisions, and the republican population has decided they have no need of critical thinking, or explanation. to make this worse upon seeing that the republicans won&apos;t justify or explain the decisions the democratic leadership has decided capitulation is the only answer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18180-299397</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:56:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhyax</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
