Comments on: Comments on 18199

Post number 18199

hobbes — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:28:21 -0800

So, ummm... does anyone have a magazine published by Man's World Publications Inc.? I heard that there are some nice photos of Jennifer Aniston in 'em, just wanted to confirm. ;) (also @ bbc)

By: Optamystic

Optamystic — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:36:01 -0800

Find your own spank-fuel, junior.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:41:20 -0800

I'm pretty sure there was a thread on Fark once with a link to it. Maybe even today. They're not that spectacular. Hardly worth the effort to find it. That's what I hear, anyway. Not that I'd look, or anything.

By: hobbes

hobbes — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:41:47 -0800

Opt, You're right, wouldn't want anyone's sloppy-seconds URL.

By: stavrosthewonderchicken

stavrosthewonderchicken — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:54:35 -0800

Dear God, please make it stop.

By: hob

hob — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 21:12:45 -0800

I just want it made clear that I had nothing to do with this.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 21:16:36 -0800

Calvin put him up to it. You know how he can be.

By: stavrosthewonderchicken

stavrosthewonderchicken — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 22:12:29 -0800

Heh. That Calvin - what a scamp.

By: webmutant

webmutant — Tue, 02 Jul 2002 22:17:44 -0800

Boyzone.

By: dash_slot-

dash_slot- — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 05:20:59 -0800

"Mefi wunderkind Miguel Cardoso is set to give evidence in court as he sues two magazine publishers for printing unauthorised photographs of him topless. The star alleges paparazzi photographers scaled an eight-foot wall to take photographs of him while he was sunbathing in him back garden. The photos ended up being used in magazines published by Man's World Publications and Crescent Publishing Group. The case will be heard on 2 July only by a judge after US District Judge Ronald Lew ruled Miguel's lawyers had not requested a jury be assigned when they first filed the lawsuit. Miguel, 33, is set to give evidence at the Los Angeles court. Although Miguel is a high-profile celebrity, commanding a reported $1m (£700,000) per episode of the US comedy Metatalk, he is protective of his privacy. His wedding in 2000 to actor Stavros Wonderchicken was a lavish affair but the couple released just one photograph from the ceremony. The topless pictures were taken in February 1999 and later appeared in magazines Celebrity Skin, High Society and Celebrity Sleuth. Miguel is seeking unspecified damages and wants a ban to be placed on further distribution of the pictures. The legal action claims the magazines violated Miguel's right to privacy after the photographer climbed a neighbour's fence to take the pictures. Miguel has settled a lawsuit against Celebrity Sleuth and has sued photographer Francois Naverre over the taking of the pictures."

By: dash_slot-

dash_slot- — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 05:25:29 -0800

[Search and replace liberties taken with this article].

By: wsfinkel

wsfinkel — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 06:07:54 -0800

Heres the picture in question.

By: monju_bosatsu

monju_bosatsu — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 06:07:56 -0800

I'm at work, Hobbes, so I won't go hunting for the URL just now. However, I have seen the pictures, and they're not all that great. They're shot from far away, to the side and behind, and you don't see much. There is a bit of a nip, so if you've got a serious jones for Ms. Aniston (excuse me, Mrs. Pitt), I guess they're worth scrounging up. [Sorry if anyone is offended, just trying to give some useful information.]

By: monju_bosatsu

monju_bosatsu — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 06:08:43 -0800

Upon posting, I see wsfinkel's post, so ignore mine.

By: ColdChef

ColdChef — Wed, 03 Jul 2002 07:38:12 -0800

Bleh. Bad photos. If you want to see good pics of Miss Pitt, check out the Vanity Fair shot she did last year. I think it was done by Annie Leibovitz, but I'm not sure. I ain't looking for it. Do your own work. Eyes forward.