July 15, 2002
8:21 PM
Subscribe
Pariah dogs of the Middle EastNo, not
these two jokers, but the
real thing:
Canaan dogs. Like the more refined
Saluki,
Sloughi,
Azawakh,
Afghan Hound and "barkless"
Basenji (among
many others), Canaan dogs have been known for thousands of years. They guard herds for
modern Bedouins like they did for ancient Israelites. During the 1930s, when traditional "war dogs" were having trouble adapting to Palestine, Zionists carefully
redomesticated the semi-wild animals, turning them into
seeing eye dogs and guards for
isolated settlements. Canaan dogs became one of the first breeds trained to detect mines effectively, although their use for bomb-sniffing remains a
touchy subject [LAT, reg'n]. You also might enjoy pondering the provocative question raised by this detailed essay: Why have all three major monotheistic religions considered dogs
"a threat to the authority of the clergy"?
posted by mediareport (8 comments total)
« Older
New Starbucks Slogan: "For Your Health".......
| Blogging while "homeless&...
Newer »
I'm Jewish and my dog-owning rabbi recently joked that German shepherds were unkosher. Still... apart from the Shoah connotations, there does seem to be a prejudice against violent dogs. Isaac Bashevis Singer, for instance, often mentioned in his stories how much he hated and feared barking and, well, animated dogs in general.
Your post got me thinking that cats are far more congenial to religion - whether monotheistic or not (think Egypt, of course) - than dogs can ever be. Even though cats are, in essence, much more aggressive and unreligious, in the sense that they're so absolutely selfish.
I like dogs and cats equally but a cat's indifference and standoffishness seems much less threatening to holistic world views. Am I barking mad in thinking such a thing? ;)
posted by MiguelCardoso at 8:36 PM on July 15, 2002