Join 3,555 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)


And you thought guns were only useful for shooting *people*.
May 30, 2000 9:41 AM   Subscribe

And you thought guns were only useful for shooting *people*.
posted by baylink (8 comments total)

 
[Note: I posted this because I thought it was *funny*; the humor-impaired (or people who think I'm wrong about it being funny) are invited to take me to task about my taste in humor *in email*, please; I think our opinions about guns have been well aired this month.]
posted by baylink at 9:43 AM on May 30, 2000


Apparently someone misunderstood the manual section about "Troubleshooting."
posted by mikewas at 10:15 AM on May 30, 2000


I wish shooting software provided that satisfying "CHTHunk!" sound, I get pist at software more than I do hardware.
posted by katchomko at 11:12 AM on May 30, 2000


And I would support a three-day waiting period before buying anything from Microsoft.
posted by wendell at 12:11 PM on May 30, 2000


<span class="pueril OS Flaming">a background check for mental illnes wouldn't be out of order, either</span>
posted by katchomko at 12:29 PM on May 30, 2000


Hee hee hee ha ha ha ho ha ha ha!!!!!!!
(Personally, I prefer my hammer when it comes to "hardware conflicts"....but this works!)
posted by EricBrooksDotCom at 12:46 PM on May 30, 2000


Perhaps we can allow restricted access to handguns for the express purpose of taking out malfunctioning computer hardware.

C'mon Baylink, if that's not a compromise, I don't know what is!
posted by aladfar at 7:28 PM on May 30, 2000


I agree. Guns and people, bad. Guns and computers, good.
Let us do this thing.
posted by Ezrael at 9:56 PM on May 30, 2000


« Older "This function could be used to see if the nanny w...  |  THAT'S a speeding ticket...... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments