<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 18780</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 18780</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:35:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 18780</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_639932.html"&gt;It is not a crime to look at bomb-making websites...&lt;/a&gt; or so says Lieutenant Jason Ciaschini, police spokesman in Punta Gorda, where a Briton who was using a computer to look at bomb-making websites is now being held at Charlotte County Jail on immigration violations.
&lt;br&gt;Florida police had evacuated the library and arrested him after he looked at bomb-making websites, and found suspicious liquids in his backpack.
&lt;br&gt;&quot;&lt;i&gt;Looking up stuff on the Internet - everybody has freedom to do that,&lt;/i&gt;&quot; he also said.


</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 04:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>		<category>freedom</category>		<category>bombs</category>		<category>internet</category>		<category>reading</category>		<category>1984</category>		<category>libraries</category>		<category>censorship</category>		<category>information</category>		<category>police</category>		<category>crime</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: substrate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312013</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve got conflicting feelings on this, and there&apos;s not enough information in the story to resolve them. Why were the police originally contacted? Was it because he was using the internet to look at bomb-making websites? Were the web-sites really bomb-making websites, or were they more general pyrotechnic sites? I guess my first problem is this: why were the police called in the first place? As an amateur pyrotechnician I&apos;ve used the library for research often, in fact my home-town library stocked books on manufacturing pyrotechnics.

The obstruction of justice charge doesn&apos;t bother me, he used a false name, so thats definitely obstructing justice. The immigration charges don&apos;t concern me either, it looks like he&apos;s guilty. What bothers me is not understanding what led the librarian (I presume, I&apos;m assuming that there were no police hiding behind the fichus) to call the police? I&apos;m hoping that it was more than looking at pyrotechnics, or even bombs on the internet. Was he acting suspicious, hostile or even rude?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312013</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>substrate</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312016</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sun-herald.com/newsarchive2/073002/CH2.HTM?date=073002&amp;story=CH2.HTM&quot;&gt;Local story&lt;/a&gt;. He was observed in his surfing by an off-duty sheriff&apos;s &quot;employee&quot;, apparently not a deputized officer. This person could be a library employee as well, or just a patron.

If we backtrack a bit to the more notorious porn-surfing problem, there are ongoing issues with public terminals; it&apos;s almost unsurprising that there are bluenoses who poke around making sure nobody&apos;s pulling up Danni Ashe. In some libraries this means, yes, the cops show up. Is it an overreaction to call in the cops for somebody looking at bomb information? I dunno. If there was nothing wrong with his visa and he&apos;d been honest, there would have been nothing to charge him with; it was probably prudent to &lt;i&gt;question&lt;/i&gt; him. Is it an overreaction when cops pull over that truck with the license plate hanging by one screw and a broken blinker? If somebody were then jailed for a more serious crime, would we say they were &quot;arrested for a broken blinker&quot;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312016</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rushmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312035</link>	
		<description>The difference is, of course, that a &quot;license plate hanging by one screw and a broken blinker&quot; are actual legal infractions, while surfing the web is not (yet).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312035</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 06:41:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rcade</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312044</link>	
		<description>This sounds like something that will turn up on the last half of a &lt;i&gt;Law and Order&lt;/i&gt; episode. If the web activity was the suspicious behavior,  the sheriff&apos;s department employee was observing the person&apos;s web use prior to that. I have no idea if that&apos;s constitutional.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312044</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:01:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: shadow45</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312348</link>	
		<description>Wow.  This literally happened about 300 yards from my front door.  Smoking a cigarette in the backyard and I see a couple police cruisers haul ass down the road behind my house.  So being the inquisitive &quot;who&apos;s getting busted?&quot; kind of kid I am, I walked to the end of our property (which is the street the library is on, a hundred yards down) and saw bomb removal trucks, camera crews and approx. 15-20 police from various offices and what appeared to be a few federal agents.  i looked really hard, but i couldn&apos;t find will smith or that talking dog anywhere.

maybe next time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312348</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:48:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shadow45</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: shadow45</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18780/#312354</link>	
		<description>Oh, and to clear things up the local buzz concerning this is that he was &apos;busted&apos; by an off-duty sheriff&apos;s office employee.  The place is really small and on the PCs anyone walking by can see what you&apos;re up to.  I chalk it up to overzealous people (probably with good intentions) that let this whole post-9/11 mentality get to them.

He&apos;s being held for having an expired Visa.  That much is legal, right?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18780-312354</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shadow45</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
