<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 18833</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 18833</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:42:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 18833</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miami/news/politics/3772625.htm"&gt;You must hack.&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s your duty as an American.  Godspeed, dear patriots.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conquistador</dc:creator>		<category>hackers</category>		<category>hacking</category>		<category>patriotism</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313242</link>	
		<description>clarke obviously hadn&apos;t seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/18822&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313242</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TskTsk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313245</link>	
		<description>This makes sense.  Maybe now Microsoft can go back to innovating rather than dealing with security.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313245</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:44:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TskTsk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: TBoneMcCool</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313250</link>	
		<description>A completely-off-the-subject complaint: I wish the Associated Press reporter who wrote that story would hack into his company&apos;s stylebook and learn that AP prefers advis&lt;i&gt;er&lt;/i&gt; to advis&lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt;. 

Sorry for the interruption. I get compulsive sometimes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313250</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:55:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TBoneMcCool</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dejah420</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313262</link>	
		<description>And yet if you do hack, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/18822&quot;&gt;you get threats&lt;/a&gt; from the company you&apos;ve exposed.  (Thread from earlier today.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313262</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:09:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dejah420</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313263</link>	
		<description>Doh.  Quonsar is the clever one here.  I&apos;ll just go off, cat like, and pretend I meant to be an idiot. :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313263</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:11:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: zekinskia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313277</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Clarke said the hackers should be responsible about reporting the programming mistakes. A hacker should contact the software maker first, he said, then go to the government if the software maker doesn&apos;t respond soon.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Is this a joke?  If not, are the software makers going to put these hackers on their payroll?

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Clarke said hackers shouldn&apos;t help criminals by showing how to exploit a programming bug before the software maker has a chance to fix the problem by issuing a patch, or fix.&lt;/i&gt;

Is this a joke too?  Hackers &lt;b&gt;ARE&lt;/b&gt; criminals, and have been viciously persecuted by software companies, even when they are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,49122,00.html &quot;&gt;unbelievably kind and responsible.&lt;/a&gt;

It&apos;s a joke, and in poor taste, I</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313277</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:37:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zekinskia</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tomorama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18833/#313300</link>	
		<description>Examining the insides of software or hardware and finding bugs nobody else has seen makes you a hacker. Reporting them to the right people so as to make the technology better for the consumers makes you a responsible person. Exploiting the same holes for your personal gain or mischeif would be what makes you a criminal.

Imho, anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.18833-313300</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:35:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
