can anyone really do a valid climate study with 3 days worth of data? they can't even predict next weeks weather with accuracy. posted by reverendX at 3:49 PM on August 8, 2002
Interestingly, the scientists believe the contrails may have a net cooling effect.
"Sept. 11-14, 2001, had the biggest diurnal temperature range of any three-day period in the past 30 years,".
Yes. Three days worth of data does seem to make an optimal study. Not sure if this was a freak occurrence or a valid outcome of the no-fly days. posted by KevinSkomsvold at 4:57 PM on August 8, 2002
sorry. should have read "does not seem". posted by KevinSkomsvold at 4:59 PM on August 8, 2002
Nor do I think that 30 years is enough time to ensure that you can predict what the "normal" temperature should be. Nope, I think the article may be correct in its assumptions, but the methodology is bunk. posted by ashbury at 5:18 PM on August 8, 2002
posted by quonsar at 3:21 PM on August 8, 2002