<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 20528</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 20528</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:19:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 20528</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theoldie.co.uk"&gt;The Oldie: Celebrating The Sulphurous Glory Of Old Fartdom&lt;/a&gt; If you&apos;re a sozzled, bilious and deeply reactionary misanthropic Brit who&apos;s over 80, hates anything foreign (specially Americans) and stubbornly refuses to die just for the pleasure of spiting the youngsters, then &lt;b&gt;The Oldie&lt;/b&gt; is definitely the magazine for you. It couldn&apos;t be more &quot;out of synch&quot; with the &quot;cool&quot; MeFi &quot;demographic&quot; but it does share the same in-your-face fuckwittedness and I love it. Its unofficial editorial manifesto, drafted by the late, great Auberon Waugh, says it all:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;. Inveighing against the ignorance, idleness, stupidity, dishonesty and sexual incompetence of the young.

&lt;b&gt;2&lt;/b&gt;. Insulting the young in any and every manifestation.

&lt;b&gt;3&lt;/b&gt;. Insulting the old who seem to be deferring or otherwise sucking up to the young.

&lt;b&gt;4&lt;/b&gt;. Promoting the idea of &quot;age fascism&quot; whereby the young are automatically seen as inferior.

&lt;b&gt;5&lt;/b&gt;. Denouncing new things, new ideas, modernism in any form, especially anything proposed in the name of youth or by someone under the age of 40.[&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;More inside&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:09:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>		<category>OldFart</category>		<category>Glory</category>		<category>Oldie</category>		<category>Magazine</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359173</link>	
		<description>To get you started (not that I expect many here to be interested...) I suggest you read:

1) Patrick Newley&apos;s account of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/feature28.html&quot;&gt;meeting Of two English queens&lt;/a&gt;: Quentin Crisp and Douglas Byng;
2) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/feature27.html&quot;&gt;Nicholas Wollaston&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; tale of two friends eaten by crocodiles;
3) The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/feature05.html&quot;&gt;Marquess of Aberdeen&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s guide to the best bordellos of days gone by;
4) Richard Ingrams&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/feature24.html&quot;&gt;reflections&lt;/a&gt; on The Oldie&apos;s first ten years (which includes the  Auberon Waugh letter I quoted.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359173</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359174</link>	
		<description>Hey, there&apos;s nothing inside! Oh, wait a minute... Oh, well. Carry on. Old people--they&apos;ve got no respect and the music they listen to is just simply melodious.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359174</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359175</link>	
		<description>Auberon Waugh had some nice things to say about Cyril Connolly or so I remember from a post of yore.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359175</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:23:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: walrus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359185</link>	
		<description>Thanks Miguel. I was just dipping through and found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/webster.html&quot;&gt;this little article&lt;/a&gt; about how the internet is growing up. I haven&apos;t read the rest yet, and maybe I&apos;m older and more sozzled and misanthropic than I thought, but I reckon that has to be worth a read however old you are.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359185</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:22:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>walrus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: delmoi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359187</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In 1945, when the militant feminists of Paris demanded, and got, the closure of all the bordellos, just one remained open...

My favourite, a chestnut-haired beauty, was fluent in several languages. She once lost her professional cool and called out in her extremity, &apos;Ach, mein Gott!&apos; Tactfully I didn&apos;t remind her that the Germans had left, defeated. &lt;/i&gt;

LOL</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359187</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:26:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Frasermoo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359189</link>	
		<description>Definitely a refreshing change.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359189</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:30:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frasermoo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: donfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359195</link>	
		<description>Are there any demographics for the MeFI community? It would be interesting to know how old we are.

Don Factor, age 68 1/2</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359195</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 02:09:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donfactor</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stavrosthewonderchicken</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359199</link>	
		<description>I am if not venerable at least old enough to know better, definitely sozzled and misanthropic, but not particularly bilious. Can I still have a cookie?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359199</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 02:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359211</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s slippers&apos;n&apos;gin journalism for oldies-in-waiting, and other young fogies, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idler.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The Idler&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359211</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 03:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359231</link>	
		<description>Miguel, I don&apos;t think you&apos;re using fuckwittedness in the right way. Pigheadedness or something like that is maybe what you want.

As for the Oldie. Well, it&apos;s not for females is it?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359231</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 04:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: grabbingsand</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359258</link>	
		<description>This is classic and shall be my phrase for the day.

&quot;I think making any sort of effort in one&apos;s life is a mistake.&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoldie.co.uk/feature28.html&quot;&gt;Quentin Crisp&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359258</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 06:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grabbingsand</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: octobersurprise</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359271</link>	
		<description>  &lt;i&gt;I&apos;m old! Gimme money!&lt;/i&gt; 

    Wow. It&apos;s like the crotchety bastard child of &lt;i&gt;Private Eye&lt;/i&gt; and, um, &lt;i&gt;Guideposts&lt;/i&gt; or something, isn&apos;t it?

    That said, Cyril Connolly is one of my heroes and I still miss Auberon Waugh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359271</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 06:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>octobersurprise</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: y2karl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359319</link>	
		<description>For you, octobersuprise, from that post of yore--&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~litrev/0597/waughonconnolly.html&quot;&gt;Auberon Waugh on Cyril Connolly&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359319</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 07:32:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: madprops</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359341</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m with Summer - the proper use of fuckwittedness would be something like, &quot;Ed Ness is one tough geezer.  If I were you I wouldn&apos;t fuckwittedness.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359341</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 07:53:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madprops</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359364</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it&apos;s not for females is it?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&apos;t know, Summer.  Oldie women tend to be more cantankerous and unashamedly reactionary than men.  Muriel Spark, P.D.James and Beryl Bainbridge are three outstanding novelists who&apos;ve written for The Oldie.  And in the British Council library here in Lisbon, it&apos;s always one of the blue-rinse brigade who&apos;s reading their one copy of the magazine.

Thanks for putting &lt;strike&gt;old clever clogs&lt;/strike&gt;me right about the fuckedwittedness. Pigheaded is exactly the right word for them!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359364</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:14:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grangousier</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359366</link>	
		<description>And Germaine Greer too, no?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359366</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:16:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grangousier</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359435</link>	
		<description>Maybe women do read The Oldie. It&apos;s just that when I think of Auberon Waugh and Richard Ingrams I think of wood-panelled mens&apos; clubs, gout, cigars and public- (boy&apos;s) school humour. Mind you, I read Private Eye and that&apos;s a similar demographic.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359435</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:13:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359471</link>	
		<description>Grangousier: Yes, Germaine Greer! She&apos;s become quite a reactionary old bird herself, hasn&apos;t she?  I venerate her, though.  She&apos;s just chosen another way of being radical. 

Summer: Private Eye is probably all male, all (minor) public school, all drunks.  Richard Ingrams is a non-smoking, non-drinking vegetarian who&apos;s a bit of a prig - the opposite of Auberon Waugh, with whom he didn&apos;t get on well.  Although he was a great Eye editor (because he actually encouraged investigative journalism, specially by the great Paul Foot) he eventually fell out with Peter Cook and left to found The Oldie because he didn&apos;t much enjoy the jokes.  

Politics apart, The Oldie has an Old Labour feel to it, with its veneration of the working class of yesteryear and fascination with popular comedians and singers of the 30s and 40s.  All contributors seem to be poor and down on their luck so I&apos;d say its demographic was quite distinct from, say, The Spectator&apos;s.

I find Private Eye hilarious but my English women friends don&apos;t.  It &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; extremely misogynist and written by men who know very little about women - so I&apos;m glad and surprised you enjoy it, Summer!  If you start reading it when you&apos;re a student, then you&apos;re hooked for life, I suppose...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359471</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:41:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Grangousier</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359483</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[Germaine Greer]&apos;s become quite a reactionary old bird herself&lt;/i&gt;

Mmm. I think it&apos;s just that she doesn&apos;t suffer fools gladly, and never has - the late sixties/early seventies fools were all right wing, so she appeared very left wing, as time has gone on all manner of idiots have crept from the woodwork across the political spectrum, so her profile has appeared to change. 

She usually seems to be right, even if that makes me uncomfortable. 

Nuff spec&apos; to Ms Greer, as I believe the young people might say.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359483</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Grangousier</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359578</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I find Private Eye hilarious but my English women friends don&apos;t&lt;/i&gt;

I&apos;m always being told I have a masculine sense of humour, usually by men who think women don&apos;t have a sense of humour at all. I often find Private Eye arrogantly smug and cynical in the worst way, but it says the stuff no-one else does, so I still read it. For me it&apos;s not primarily a humour magazine, it&apos;s about keeping an eye on the pompous and hypocritical. If something&apos;s seriously amiss in the country you know where you&apos;re going to hear it first. 

&lt;i&gt;She&apos;s become quite a reactionary old bird herself, hasn&apos;t she? &lt;/i&gt;

You wouldn&apos;t say that if you&apos;d read The Whole Woman. As Grangousier rightly says, she doesn&apos;t suffer fools gladly and doesn&apos;t automatically follow the left just because she&apos;s expected to. She&apos;s her own person and my complete heroine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359578</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:04:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MiguelCardoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359828</link>	
		<description>I not only read The Whole Woman - I read (and loved) The Change. In hardback! In fact, I think I&apos;ve read everything she&apos;s written - including all her Telegraph farming columns.  As I said, I venerate her.  Being a bit of a reactionary myself, my use of the word is far from negative.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359828</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:45:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZachsMind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359836</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hey you snot nosed kids! 
Get off the lawn! 
I&apos;m not gonna tell you again! 
You disrespectful little twerps!&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;small&gt;come back inside, Joe&lt;/small&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Lookit those damn kids! 
How many times have I told them
to get off the lawn!
They&apos;re gonna stomp on all the weeds! 
Get off the lawn! 
Damn kids! 
Oh lookit out there! 
Now those kids got bottle rockets! 
Get off the lawn!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359836</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:59:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: octobersurprise</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20528/#359878</link>	
		<description> Thanks for the link, y2k, the Lewis bio is good. One of my favorite Connolly comments--I&apos;ve just dug it out--is Frank Kermode&apos;s: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Connolly was charmingly selfish and incredibly unreliable, literally out to lunch most of the time, usually in expensive restaurants with someone else paying. He rarely rose before noon, and was out or entertaining most evenings; he was constantly enjoying the sweet melancholy of competing and time consuming amorous claims ...&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
 And speaking of old birds, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,320853,00.html&quot;&gt;she&lt;/a&gt; was another favorite of mine.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20528-359878</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 18:53:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>octobersurprise</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
