<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 20529</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20529//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 20529</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 06:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 06:11:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 20529</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20529/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992879"&gt;Amorous ostriches scoop Ig Nobel prize.&lt;/a&gt; &apos;An investigation into why amorous UK ostriches were failing to breed is just one of the winners of the 2002 Ig Nobel Prizes. The annual awards for achievements that &quot;cannot or should not be reproduced&quot; were presented at Harvard University on 3 October. &apos;&lt;br&gt;
&apos;Work on scrotal asymmetry in men and sculpture, the surface area of Indian elephants and a Japanese dog bark translator were among the other recipients of Ig Nobels, awarded annually by the humour magazine, the Annals of Improbable Research.&apos;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.improbable.com/ig/ig-top.html&quot;&gt;The Ig Nobel homepage.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20529</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:50:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>		<category>ostriches</category>		<category>IgNobels</category>		<category>IgNobel</category>		<category>prizes</category>		<category>scrotalasymmetry</category>		<category>scrota</category>		<category>ostrichbreeding</category>		<category>science</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Secret Life of Gravy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20529/#359261</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;in statues &quot;the left testicle is always the larger, as in nature&quot;. He took a closer look at 107 anatomically correct male statues, and found that the historian was right about most statues but wrong about men, which normally have larger right testicles&lt;/i&gt;

It&apos;s not just testicles.  I remember reading in David Hockney&apos;s book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0670030260/qid=1033736840/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/002-3100217-8589636&quot;&gt;Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters,&lt;/a&gt; that painters and sculptors more often than not portray their human subjects as left-handed.  Take a look at some artwork and you will see people holding drinks, books, etc. with their left hand.  Apparently this looks more &lt;i&gt;natural&lt;/i&gt; to the viewer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20529-359261</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 06:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Secret Life of Gravy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: son_of_minya</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20529/#359671</link>	
		<description>I would have liked to see links for those items run off in the last sentence.  Feeling lazy right now, but want to read about the Japanese dog bark translator later.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.20529-359671</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 13:54:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>son_of_minya</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
